[#85349] [Ruby trunk Bug#14334] Segmentation fault after running rspec (ruby/2.5.0/erb.rb:885 / simplecov/source_file.rb:85) — pragtob@...
Issue #14334 has been updated by PragTob (Tobias Pfeiffer).
3 messages
2018/02/02
[#85358] Re: [ruby-cvs:69220] nobu:r62039 (trunk): compile.c: unnecessary freezing — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:
5 messages
2018/02/03
[#85612] Why require autoconf 2.67+ — leam hall <leamhall@...>
Please pardon the intrusion; I am new to Ruby and like to pull the
6 messages
2018/02/17
[#85616] Re: Why require autoconf 2.67+
— Vít Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2018/02/18
VGhpcyBjb3VsZCBoZWxwIHlvdSB0byBidWlsZCBSdWJ5IHdpdGggb2xkZXIgYXV0b2NvbmYgKDIu
[#85634] [Ruby trunk Bug#14494] [PATCH] tool/m4/ruby_replace_type.m4 use AC_CHECK_TYPES for HAVE_* macros — normalperson@...
Issue #14494 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
3 messages
2018/02/19
[#85674] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — matz@...
Issue #13618 has been updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto).
5 messages
2018/02/20
[#85686] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/02/20
matz@ruby-lang.org wrote:
[#85704] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Koichi Sasada <ko1@...>
2018/02/21
On 2018/02/20 18:06, Eric Wong wrote:
[ruby-core:85356] [Ruby trunk Bug#14014] NaN.finite?
From:
nagachika00@...
Date:
2018-02-03 02:39:48 UTC
List:
ruby-core #85356
Issue #14014 has been updated by nagachika (Tomoyuki Chikanaga). Backport changed from 2.3: DONTNEED, 2.4: REQUIRED to 2.3: DONTNEED, 2.4: DONE ruby_2_4 r62173 merged revision(s) 60040,60188. ---------------------------------------- Bug #14014: NaN.finite? https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14014#change-70140 * Author: marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune) * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: 2.5 * ruby -v: 2.4.2 * Backport: 2.3: DONTNEED, 2.4: DONE ---------------------------------------- Ruby gives contradictory answers for NaN: ``` > (0/0.0).finite? => false > Complex(0/0.0, 0).finite? => true ``` Note that `(0/0.0).infinite?` returns `nil`, so the float answer of `false` looks even more wrong. The two solutions I see are either changing `Float#finite?` to return `true` for NaN, or to raise in both cases. I'd lean towards raising in both cases, as NaN can not be said to be finite or infinite -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>