[#40602] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5532][Open] Compile problem for bigdecimal on cygwin — Martin Dürst <duerst@...>
[#40646] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5541][Open] Better configure error message when llvm-gcc is the default compiler — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
[#40647] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5542][Open] Ruby 1.9.3-p0 changed arity on default initialization method — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...>
[#40648] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5543][Open] rb_thread_blocking_region() API is poorly designed — Christopher Huff <cjameshuff@...>
[#40662] Relevant methods not appearing in RDoc — Andrew Grimm <andrew.j.grimm@...>
The method Module.private_constant isn't appearing in
On Nov 1, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Andrew Grimm wrote:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#40684] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5555][Open] rename #include? to #includes? — Alexey Muranov <muranov@...>
> The basic naming for methods in standard class libraries are:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 15:47, Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It always confuses me how that one defies the rule.
[#40688] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5556][Open] SIGHUP no longer ignored when sent to process group from a subprocess — Brian Ford <brixen@...>
[#40706] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5562][Open] Improvement of Windows IO performance — Hiroshi Shirosaki <h.shirosaki@...>
[#40737] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5570][Open] Encoding of environment variables on Windows — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
Hello,
[#40748] Proposal for sustainable branch maintenance — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Why maintain 1.9.1 at all? I don't see the benefit. People need to
[#40751] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5574][Open] Make arrays comparable — Arnau Sanchez <rbarnau@...>
[#40770] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5578][Open] Embedded YAML for Ruby 2.0 — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
[#40806] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5583][Open] Optionally typing — Yasushi ANDO <andyjpn@...>
[#40824] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5588][Open] add negation flag (v) to Regexp — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...>
[#40840] A quiz: Re: Second patch attempt for PATH_MAX fix in ruby1.9.1- 1.9.3~rc1-3 — Svante Signell <svante.signell@...>
Hello,
[#40845] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #5599][Open] YAML.load_documents — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
[#40865] IO.copy_stream creates files with restrictive permissions — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I'm not sure if this is a bug or intended as spec.
2011/11/9 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
>> I noticed when a file name argument is passed to the IO.copy_stream, the
On 20/11/2011, at 5:09 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
2011/11/20 Clifford Heath <clifford.heath@gmail.com>:
>> I think documentation is the wrong answer. The security defects are not caused
2011/11/22 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>:
On 22/11/2011, at 9:39 AM, Tanaka Akira wrote:
2011/11/22 Clifford Heath <clifford.heath@gmail.com>:
>> The umask that almost every Unix distribution has always had in /etc/profile - which is 022.
[#40867] Question regarding Ruby 2.0 backwards compatibility — Martin Bo煬et <martin.bosslet@...>
If I recall it correctly, the goal for 2.0 was to stay API-compatible
[#40898] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5605][Open] [PATCH] net/http: use IO.copy_stream for requests using body_stream — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[#40908] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5607][Open] Inconsistent reaction in Range of String — Yen-Nan Lin <redmine@...>
[#40941] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5617][Open] Allow install RubyGems into dediceted directory — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
[#40943] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5619][Open] Segfault on OS X — Otto Hilska <otto@...>
[#40951] [Backport93 - Backport #5621][Open] Please backport thread-safe autoloading patch — Mike Perham <mperham@...>
Unfortunately ruby-head has a deadlock in one of my go-to scenarios for
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Hiroshi Nakamura <nahi@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Hiroshi Nakamura <nahi@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
(2011/11/19 6:31), Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Hiroshi Nakamura <nahi@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
(2011/11/19 9:08), Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#40982] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5625][Open] Remove profanity and pejoratives — Andrew Grimm <andrew.j.grimm@...>
I was not aiming to protect children from the f-word. My intention was
[#41004] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5628][Open] Module#basename — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
[#41024] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5632][Open] Attempt to open included class shades it instead. — Boris Stitnicky <boris@...>
[#41025] Proposal to add new methods: positive? negative? natural? — JosFrancisco Calvo Moreno <josefranciscocalvo@...>
Hi all!
On 11/15 12:58, Jos? Francisco Calvo Moreno wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
Hi Chuck,
2011/11/14 JosFrancisco Calvo Moreno <josefranciscocalvo@gmail.com>:
I don't have a deep understanding of ruby core base types but I want to
On IEEE 754 Floating Point Numbers, there are positive 0.0 and negative 0.0.
Do you suggest the following?
[#41038] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5634][Open] yield and binding — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
[#41078] mkmf sets CFLAGS to contain flags that it shouldn't be setting — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
Hi!
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 07:24, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 14:46, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#41079] Why doesn’t mkmf’s have_macro add a HAVE_X to $defs? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
Hi!
Hi,
[#41086] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5644][Open] add Enumerable#exclude? antonym — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...>
[#41114] [Backport93 - Backport #5646][Open] Backport r33775 — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
> Also, is there a script for doing backports? t looks like the commit messages are generated.
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 02:19:31AM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>> > Also, is there a script for doing backports? t looks like the commit messages are generated.
[#41116] Pathname['abc'] instead of Pathname('abc') global method as constructor alternative — "Alexander E. Fischer" <aef@...>
Hello,
[#41149] autoload will be dead — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
Does this also mean that we will not enhance const_missing to support
[#41160] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5650][Open] Add rb_enc_raise() to allow C extensions to raise errors with messages with correct encoding — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
[#41161] conflict between 1.8.7 and 1.9.3 installations — Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@...>
Hi,
On 11/19/2011 04:55 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#41171] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5653] "I strongly discourage the use of autoload in any standard libraries" (Re: autoload will be dead) — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...>
[#41175] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5654][Open] Introduce global lock to avoid concurrent require — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...>
[#41186] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5657][Open] Constants in included modules aren't visible when defining classes with Class.new — Gary Bernhardt <gary.bernhardt@...>
[#41211] Availability of ruby/intern.h — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
Are functions accessible via ruby/intern.h considered to be "public"
[#41212] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5662][Open] inject-accumulate, or Haskell's mapAccum* — Edvard Majakari <edvard.majakari@...>
[#41213] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5663][Open] Combined map/select method — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>
[#41256] [ruby-trunk - Feature #2567] Net::HTTP does not handle encoding correctly — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>
[#41262] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5666][Open] Make rb_path2class public — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
[#41302] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5673][Open] undef_method probably doesn't need to raise an error — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
[#41314] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5675][Open] [mingw] static build fails due to socket extension build failure — Jon Forums <redmine@...>
> compiling ../../../ext/socket/socket.c
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 4:11 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
2011/11/27 Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>:
[#41321] [Proposal] C API arrangement — Yugui <yugui@...>
Hi, mame-san
[#41336] Wrong encoding of Symbol — Andriy Tyurnikov <andriy.tyurnikov@...>
By default Symbols are encoded as US-ASCII,
Hi,
Hi,
Matz wrote :
[#41338] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5677][Open] IO C API — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>
[#41340] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5678][Open] StringIO#to_str — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>
[#41351] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5679][Open] Too many arguments for format warnings on mingw32 build — Heesob Park <phasis@...>
> I can see the following warnings during mingw32 build.
[#41370] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5681][Open] Conflcting types for rb_w32_inet_ntop caused by duplicate definition under MinGW — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/11/28 Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>:
[#41404] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5690][Open] Module#qualified_const_get — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>
Hi,
[ruby-core:41350] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5677][Open] IO C API
Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@googlemail.com> wrote: > This is related to the proposal in [ruby-core:41321][1]. > > I'd like to take advantage of streaming IO in an extension I am > working on. The problem I'm having is that I don't want to call > IO#read on the rb_funcall level because that would kill the > performance due to wrapping the bytes into Ruby objects back and > forth again. Is starting with Ruby String objects (with binary encoding) and then having read(2)/write(2) hit RSTRING_PTR not possible? > I saw two solutions to my problem: > > 1. Duplicating the file descriptor to obtain a pure FILE* > like it is done in ext/openssl/ossl_bio.c[2] and continue > working on the raw FILE*. That may be from the old 1.8 days when all IO objects wrapped FILE *. It might be better to use BIO_new_fd() nowadays instead since 1.9 generally prefers bare file descriptors (for all fd > 2). > 2. Since I really only need to read and write on the stream, > I was looking for public Ruby C API that would support me > in the process, and I found > > - ssize_t rb_io_bufwrite(VALUE io, const void *buf, size_t size) > - ssize_t rb_io_bufread(VALUE io, void *buf, size_t size) Is userspace buffering really necessary in your case? If you're working with sockets/pipes, I would reckon not (Ruby already defaults to IO#sync=false on sockets/pipes when writing). If you're reading (and probably parsing), you would need to do your own read buffering anyways, no? > I think both cases are valid use cases, 1. is likely necessary > if there is the need to pass a FILE* on to an external C library, It's not easily possible to share userspace buffers in FILE * with userspace buffers in rb_io_t. Userspace buffering is pretty miserable and error-prone whenever/wherever IPC is concerned. > 2. is for cases like mine where there is the need to operate > on raw C data types for performance reasons. It depends on what you're doing, but if performance is a concern you should try to work on largish chunks off the file descriptor and skip the userspace buffering stages. Userspace buffering can improve performance by reducing syscalls, but it can also double the memory bandwidth required to do things.