[#40602] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5532][Open] Compile problem for bigdecimal on cygwin — Martin Dürst <duerst@...>
[#40646] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5541][Open] Better configure error message when llvm-gcc is the default compiler — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
[#40647] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5542][Open] Ruby 1.9.3-p0 changed arity on default initialization method — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...>
[#40648] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5543][Open] rb_thread_blocking_region() API is poorly designed — Christopher Huff <cjameshuff@...>
[#40662] Relevant methods not appearing in RDoc — Andrew Grimm <andrew.j.grimm@...>
The method Module.private_constant isn't appearing in
On Nov 1, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Andrew Grimm wrote:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#40684] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5555][Open] rename #include? to #includes? — Alexey Muranov <muranov@...>
> The basic naming for methods in standard class libraries are:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 15:47, Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It always confuses me how that one defies the rule.
[#40688] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5556][Open] SIGHUP no longer ignored when sent to process group from a subprocess — Brian Ford <brixen@...>
[#40706] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5562][Open] Improvement of Windows IO performance — Hiroshi Shirosaki <h.shirosaki@...>
[#40737] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5570][Open] Encoding of environment variables on Windows — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
Hello,
[#40748] Proposal for sustainable branch maintenance — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Why maintain 1.9.1 at all? I don't see the benefit. People need to
[#40751] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5574][Open] Make arrays comparable — Arnau Sanchez <rbarnau@...>
[#40770] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5578][Open] Embedded YAML for Ruby 2.0 — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
[#40806] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5583][Open] Optionally typing — Yasushi ANDO <andyjpn@...>
[#40824] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5588][Open] add negation flag (v) to Regexp — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...>
[#40840] A quiz: Re: Second patch attempt for PATH_MAX fix in ruby1.9.1- 1.9.3~rc1-3 — Svante Signell <svante.signell@...>
Hello,
[#40845] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #5599][Open] YAML.load_documents — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
[#40865] IO.copy_stream creates files with restrictive permissions — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I'm not sure if this is a bug or intended as spec.
2011/11/9 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
>> I noticed when a file name argument is passed to the IO.copy_stream, the
On 20/11/2011, at 5:09 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
2011/11/20 Clifford Heath <clifford.heath@gmail.com>:
>> I think documentation is the wrong answer. The security defects are not caused
2011/11/22 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>:
On 22/11/2011, at 9:39 AM, Tanaka Akira wrote:
2011/11/22 Clifford Heath <clifford.heath@gmail.com>:
>> The umask that almost every Unix distribution has always had in /etc/profile - which is 022.
[#40867] Question regarding Ruby 2.0 backwards compatibility — Martin Bo煬et <martin.bosslet@...>
If I recall it correctly, the goal for 2.0 was to stay API-compatible
[#40898] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5605][Open] [PATCH] net/http: use IO.copy_stream for requests using body_stream — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[#40908] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5607][Open] Inconsistent reaction in Range of String — Yen-Nan Lin <redmine@...>
[#40941] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5617][Open] Allow install RubyGems into dediceted directory — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
[#40943] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5619][Open] Segfault on OS X — Otto Hilska <otto@...>
[#40951] [Backport93 - Backport #5621][Open] Please backport thread-safe autoloading patch — Mike Perham <mperham@...>
Unfortunately ruby-head has a deadlock in one of my go-to scenarios for
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Hiroshi Nakamura <nahi@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Hiroshi Nakamura <nahi@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
(2011/11/19 6:31), Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Hiroshi Nakamura <nahi@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
(2011/11/19 9:08), Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#40982] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5625][Open] Remove profanity and pejoratives — Andrew Grimm <andrew.j.grimm@...>
I was not aiming to protect children from the f-word. My intention was
[#41004] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5628][Open] Module#basename — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
[#41024] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5632][Open] Attempt to open included class shades it instead. — Boris Stitnicky <boris@...>
[#41025] Proposal to add new methods: positive? negative? natural? — JosFrancisco Calvo Moreno <josefranciscocalvo@...>
Hi all!
On 11/15 12:58, Jos? Francisco Calvo Moreno wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
Hi Chuck,
2011/11/14 JosFrancisco Calvo Moreno <josefranciscocalvo@gmail.com>:
I don't have a deep understanding of ruby core base types but I want to
On IEEE 754 Floating Point Numbers, there are positive 0.0 and negative 0.0.
Do you suggest the following?
[#41038] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5634][Open] yield and binding — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
[#41078] mkmf sets CFLAGS to contain flags that it shouldn't be setting — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
Hi!
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 07:24, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 14:46, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#41079] Why doesn’t mkmf’s have_macro add a HAVE_X to $defs? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
Hi!
Hi,
[#41086] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5644][Open] add Enumerable#exclude? antonym — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...>
[#41114] [Backport93 - Backport #5646][Open] Backport r33775 — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
> Also, is there a script for doing backports? t looks like the commit messages are generated.
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 02:19:31AM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>> > Also, is there a script for doing backports? t looks like the commit messages are generated.
[#41116] Pathname['abc'] instead of Pathname('abc') global method as constructor alternative — "Alexander E. Fischer" <aef@...>
Hello,
[#41149] autoload will be dead — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
Does this also mean that we will not enhance const_missing to support
[#41160] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5650][Open] Add rb_enc_raise() to allow C extensions to raise errors with messages with correct encoding — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
[#41161] conflict between 1.8.7 and 1.9.3 installations — Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@...>
Hi,
On 11/19/2011 04:55 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#41171] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5653] "I strongly discourage the use of autoload in any standard libraries" (Re: autoload will be dead) — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...>
[#41175] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5654][Open] Introduce global lock to avoid concurrent require — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...>
[#41186] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5657][Open] Constants in included modules aren't visible when defining classes with Class.new — Gary Bernhardt <gary.bernhardt@...>
[#41211] Availability of ruby/intern.h — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
Are functions accessible via ruby/intern.h considered to be "public"
[#41212] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5662][Open] inject-accumulate, or Haskell's mapAccum* — Edvard Majakari <edvard.majakari@...>
[#41213] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5663][Open] Combined map/select method — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>
[#41256] [ruby-trunk - Feature #2567] Net::HTTP does not handle encoding correctly — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>
[#41262] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5666][Open] Make rb_path2class public — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
[#41302] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5673][Open] undef_method probably doesn't need to raise an error — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
[#41314] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5675][Open] [mingw] static build fails due to socket extension build failure — Jon Forums <redmine@...>
> compiling ../../../ext/socket/socket.c
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 4:11 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
2011/11/27 Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>:
[#41321] [Proposal] C API arrangement — Yugui <yugui@...>
Hi, mame-san
[#41336] Wrong encoding of Symbol — Andriy Tyurnikov <andriy.tyurnikov@...>
By default Symbols are encoded as US-ASCII,
Hi,
Hi,
Matz wrote :
[#41338] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5677][Open] IO C API — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>
[#41340] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5678][Open] StringIO#to_str — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>
[#41351] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5679][Open] Too many arguments for format warnings on mingw32 build — Heesob Park <phasis@...>
> I can see the following warnings during mingw32 build.
[#41370] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5681][Open] Conflcting types for rb_w32_inet_ntop caused by duplicate definition under MinGW — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/11/28 Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>:
[#41404] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5690][Open] Module#qualified_const_get — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>
Hi,
[ruby-core:41358] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4409] DRb: discrepency between DRb.here? and DRb.uri leads to failure to dereference a DrbObject
Issue #4409 has been updated by Cory Banks.
Nicolas, thank you for reporting this issue - http://roofracksforvan.com
----------------------------------------
Bug #4409: DRb: discrepency between DRb.here? and DRb.uri leads to failure to dereference a DrbObject
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4409
Author: Nicolas Bondoux
Status: Closed
Priority: Normal
Assignee: Masatoshi Seki
Category: lib
Target version: 1.9.3
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2p0 (2010-08-18 revision 29036) [i486-linux]
=begin
When a reference on a local object is sent back by a client to a server, it may not be recognised as a local object during marshalling:
An object instance being sent as a reference is wrapped in a DRbObject built by make_proxy with DRbObject.new(obj); the DRbObject's uri will be the uri returned by DRb::uri.
When this reference is sent back, DRbObject::_load checks if it matches uri of current server with DRb::here? method.
The problem is that DRb.here? checks that a DRbObject uri is the same as the uri which was used by current DRbServer at his creation, while DRb.uri will return an uri created from the local socket from current thread's connection.
So, when a DRbObject it sent back, it may not be recognized as referencing a local object
Fixing DRb.here? so that it compares with the uri returned by DRb.uri should be enough to quick fix this problem, and seems safe to me.
(I call it a quick fix because I am sure that even with this change, it is possible to build some less realistics cases with the same kind of problem, due to the fact that a same reference may be valid or not depending which client sent it back ...)
Here is a very simple proof of concept:
The server:
#!/usr/bin/ruby
require 'drb'
class A
include DRb::DRbUndumped
end
class TheServer
include DRb::DRbUndumped
def initialize
@a = A.new
end
def get_a
@a
end
def is_a(iA)
puts "inside is_a: current DRb.uri:#{DRb.uri}; iA.class = #{iA.class} #{iA.__drburi if DRb::DRbObject === iA}"
@a.eql? iA
end
def getToken
retVal = @@token.clone
@@token.inc
return retVal
end
end
theServer = TheServer.new
DRb.start_service(nil,theServer)
puts "DRb.uri just after start_service: #{DRb.uri}"
DRb.thread.join
#############
The client:
#!/usr/bin/ruby
require 'drb'
theServer = DRb::DRbObject.new(nil,ARGV.shift)
a = theServer.get_a
puts "a.__drburi == #{a.__drburi}"
puts "theServer.is_a(a) == #{theServer.is_a(a)}"
#############
the outputs:
server side:
DRb.uri just after start_service: druby://Venus:60106
inside is_a: current DRb.uri:druby://127.0.0.1:60106; iA.class = DRb::DRbObject druby://127.0.0.1:60106
client side:
a.__drburi == druby://127.0.0.1:60106
theServer.is_a(a) == false
Cheers,
Nicolas
=end
--
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org