[ruby-core:46138] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5543] rb_thread_blocking_region() API is poorly designed

Issue #5543 has been updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada).


"int" may not be large enough to keep a pointer.
----------------------------------------
Feature #5543: rb_thread_blocking_region() API is poorly designed
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/5543#change-27750

Author: cjameshuff (Christopher Huff)
Status: Feedback
Priority: Normal
Assignee: ko1 (Koichi Sasada)
Category: 
Target version: 2.0.0


First, rb_thread_blocking_region() requires the blocking code to be pulled out into a separate function, scattering code through the source file and giving the coder more work to do to pass information through to that function. Something like rb_thread_blocking_region_begin() and rb_thread_blocking_region_end(), or the BLOCKING_REGION macro used to implement rb_thread_blocking_region(), would be far more convenient to use, but were apparently deprecated and are now only usable within thread.c.

Worse, the function passed to rb_thread_blocking_region() must return a Ruby VALUE, but also must execute without a VM lock. It is rather nonsensical to specify that a function return a Ruby object while forbidding it from accessing most of Ruby. It is likely the function won't touch the anything related to Ruby at all, and while you can use casting to work around it, you shouldn't have to. The main result of all this is less readable and even somewhat misleading code.


-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/