ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#2320] Problems in mathn, rational, complex, matrix — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

I received a message from Richard Graham mentioning a problem in the

5 messages 2004/02/01
[#2321] Re: Problems in mathn, rational, complex, matrix — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2004/02/01

[#2322] Re: Problems in mathn, rational, complex, matrix — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/01

On Sunday, February 1, 2004, 7:02:31 PM, Mathieu wrote:
[#2323] Re: Problems in mathn, rational, complex, matrix — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/02/01

On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 18:11:50 +0900, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
[#2324] Re: Problems in mathn, rational, complex, matrix — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2004/02/01

[#2327] Ruby 2 Status — "BH - Brad Coish" <BCoish@...>

All:

1 message 2004/02/02

[#2328] CGI::Session.rb — emschwar@... (Eric Schwartz)

I'm sorry, I found a typo in my previous version of the patch. Here

2 messages 2004/02/02
[#2907] Re: [PATCH] CGI::Session.rb — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/19

Hi,

[#2335] rb_io_puts is strange — Elliott Hughes <ehughes@...>

i just tracked down some incorrect behavior (missing newlines in the output)

2 messages 2004/02/03
[#2337] Re: rb_io_puts is strange — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/03

Hi,

[#2336] REXML Bug in IOSource's initialize? — "Zachary P. Landau" <kapheine@...>

1 message 2004/02/03

[#2340] Re: rb_io_puts is strange — Elliott Hughes <ehughes@...>

3 messages 2004/02/04
[#2341] Re: rb_io_puts is strange — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/04

Hi,
[#2345] Re: rb_io_puts is strange — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2004/02/05

[#2342] Re: rb_io_puts is strange — Elliott Hughes <ehughes@...>

3 messages 2004/02/04
[#2343] Re: rb_io_puts is strange — "J.Herre" <jlst@...> 2004/02/04

[#2344] Re: rb_io_puts is strange — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/04

Hi,

[#2346] Patch for socket.c: control reverse lookup for every instance — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...>

Hi all

4 messages 2004/02/05
[#2347] Re: Patch for socket.c: control reverse lookup for every instance — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/05

Hi,
[#2348] Re: Patch for socket.c: control reverse lookup for every instance — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/06

Hi,
[#2351] Re: Patch for socket.c: control reverse lookup for every instance — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...> 2004/02/06

On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 08:40:14 +0900

[#2349] RDoc should recognise https:// links — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>

Patch attached.

2 messages 2004/02/06
[#2350] Re: RDoc should recognise https:// links — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/06

[#2352] Persistent IRB history — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...>

Hi all

4 messages 2004/02/06
[#2354] Re: [PATCH] Persistent IRB history — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/07

Hi,
[#2356] Re: [PATCH] Persistent IRB history — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...> 2004/02/07

On Sat, 7 Feb 2004 10:58:20 +0900
[#2358] Re: [PATCH] Persistent IRB history — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/07

Hi,

[#2353] RCR Mailing List — "T. Onoma" <transami@...>

This post is primarily directed to Matz, but is posted here for everyone to

3 messages 2004/02/06
[#2355] Re: RCR Mailing List — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2004/02/07

On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, T. Onoma wrote:
[#2359] Re: RCR Mailing List — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2004/02/08

On Saturday 07 February 2004 03:15 am, Chad Fowler wrote:

[#2357] Use the BasicSocket#do_not_reverse_lookup flag in Webrick — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...>

Hi

5 messages 2004/02/07
[#2360] Re: [PATCH] Use the BasicSocket#do_not_reverse_lookup flag in Webrick — "Kawaji, Shinya" <kawaji@...> 2004/02/09

Hi,
[#2361] Re: [PATCH] Use the BasicSocket#do_not_reverse_lookup flag in Webrick — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...> 2004/02/09

Hi,
[#2363] Re: [PATCH] Use the BasicSocket#do_not_reverse_lookup flag inWebrick — "Kawaji, Shinya" <kawaji@...> 2004/02/09

Hi,
[#2362] Re: [PATCH] Use the BasicSocket#do_not_reverse_lookup flag in Webrick — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/09

Hi,

[#2364] Maybe bug — "Dmitry V. Sabanin" <sdmitry@...>

Hi there

2 messages 2004/02/09
[#2365] Re: Maybe bug — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/09

Hi,

[#2366] Re: rb_io_puts is strange — Elliott Hughes <ehughes@...>

1 message 2004/02/11

[#2367] Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

From ruby-dev summary:

60 messages 2004/02/11
[#2368] Re: Standard libraries — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/11

On Wednesday 11 February 2004 14:36, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2372] Re: Standard libraries — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/11

On Thursday, February 12, 2004, 7:36:18 AM, Sean wrote:
[#2369] Re: Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/11

[#2371] Re: Standard libraries — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/11

On Wednesday 11 February 2004 15:54, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2373] Re: Standard libraries — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/11

Hi,
[#2374] Re: Standard libraries — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/11

> Hi,
[#2375] Re: Standard libraries — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/12

Hi,
[#2377] Re: Standard libraries — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

[#2382] Re: Standard libraries — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/12

Hi,
[#2388] Re: Standard libraries — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/02/12

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2389] Re: Standard libraries — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

>> Here's the modified version of your criteria, that I can accept:
[#2400] Re: Standard libraries — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2004/02/12

On Thursday, 12 February 2004 at 15:29:48 +0900, why the lucky stiff wrote:
[#2390] Re: Standard libraries — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/12

Hi,
[#2421] Re: Standard libraries — "J.Herre" <jlst@...> 2004/02/13

[#2433] Re: Standard libraries — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/13

On Thursday 12 February 2004 20:13, J.Herre wrote:
[#2387] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/12

Hi,
[#2428] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/13

Hi,
[#2436] Re: Standard libraries — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2004/02/13

On Friday 13 February 2004 07:00, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
[#2429] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/13

Hi,
[#2432] Re: Standard libraries — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/13

By the way, this issue is about a matter of taste, so the debate is somewhat
[#2437] Re: Standard libraries — "J.Herre" <jlst@...> 2004/02/13

[#2439] Re: Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/13

[#2442] Re: Standard libraries — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/13

On Saturday, February 14, 2004, 5:04:45 AM, Dave wrote:
[#2440] Re: Standard libraries — "J.Herre" <jlst@...> 2004/02/13

[#2441] Re: Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/13

[#2457] Re: Standard libraries — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/02/17

On Sat 14 Feb 2004 at 03:04:45 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2458] Re: Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/17

[#2462] Re: Standard libraries — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/02/18

On Tue 17 Feb 2004 at 15:42:41 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2430] Re: Standard libraries — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/13

>>From my experience, for good development, library user
[#2434] Re: Standard libraries — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/02/13

On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 03:14:49PM +0900, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
[#2435] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/13

Hi,
[#2447] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/14

Hi,
[#2386] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/12

Hi,
[#2392] Re: Standard libraries — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/02/12

On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 02:58:22PM +0900, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
[#2393] Re: Standard libraries — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

On Thursday, February 12, 2004, 8:18:32 PM, Mauricio wrote:
[#2401] Re: Standard libraries — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/12

On Thursday 12 February 2004 04:37, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
[#2405] Re: Standard libraries — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

On Friday, February 13, 2004, 12:44:15 AM, Sean wrote:
[#2410] Re: Standard libraries — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/12

(Dave Thomas: there's a question for you in the second paragraph; if you're
[#2412] Re: Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/12

[#2414] Re: Standard libraries — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/12

On Thursday 12 February 2004 11:54, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2415] Re: Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/12

[#2420] Re: Standard libraries — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/13

On Thursday 12 February 2004 15:26, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2424] Re: Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/13

[#2425] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/13

Hi,
[#2427] Re: Standard libraries — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/13

[#2426] Re: Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/13

[#2370] Re: Standard libraries — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2004/02/11

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2376] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/12

Hi,
[#2378] Re: Standard libraries — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

> Hi,
[#2383] Re: Standard libraries — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/12

Hi,
[#2384] Re: Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/12

[#2379] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/12

Hi,
[#2381] Re: Standard libraries — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

> Hi,
[#2394] Re: Standard libraries — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/02/12

Hi --
[#2396] Re: Standard libraries — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/12

Hi,
[#2380] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/12

Hi,
[#2385] Re: Standard libraries — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

[NaHi:]
[#2391] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/12

Hi,
[#2431] Re: Standard libraries — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2004/02/13

[#2395] Comments on base64.rb — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

While adding documentation to base64.rb and backporting it to 1.8, I

1 message 2004/02/12

[#2397] PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

Index: cgi-lib.rb

15 messages 2004/02/12
[#2446] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/14

Hi,
[#2398] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — E F van de Laar <emiel@...> 2004/02/12

* Gavin Sinclair (gsinclair@soyabean.com.au) wrote:
[#2399] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

On Thursday, February 12, 2004, 11:39:37 PM, E wrote:
[#2417] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/02/12

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:02:47 +0900, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
[#2418] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

>> +warn "Warning: getopts is deprecated after Ruby 1.8.1; use getoptlong
[#2402] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/12

Hi,
[#2403] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

On Friday, February 13, 2004, 1:32:10 AM, Yukihiro wrote:
[#2406] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/12

Hi,
[#2404] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/12

Hi,
[#2407] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

On Friday, February 13, 2004, 1:56:25 AM, Hiroshi wrote:
[#2408] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/12

Hi,
[#2409] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — WATANABE Hirofumi <eban@...> 2004/02/12

Hi,
[#2413] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/12

Hi,
[#2419] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/13

Hi,

[#2411] Re: Comments on base64.rb — "Berger, Daniel" <djberge@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2004/02/12
[#2416] Re: Comments on base64.rb — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/02/12

On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:40:37 +0900, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#2422] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * lib/ftools.rb: documented — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>

Hello,

6 messages 2004/02/13
[#2423] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * lib/ftools.rb: documented — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2004/02/13

Hello,
[#2444] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * lib/ftools.rb: documented — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/14

On Friday, February 13, 2004, 1:19:20 PM, U.Nakamura wrote:
[#2445] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * lib/ftools.rb: documented — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/14

Hi,
[#2448] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * lib/ftools.rb: documented — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/14

On Saturday, February 14, 2004, 8:51:53 PM, Yukihiro wrote:
[#2443] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * lib/ftools.rb: documented — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/14

On Friday, February 13, 2004, 1:00:11 PM, U.Nakamura wrote:

[#2438] ri data location — "J.Herre" <jlst@...>

1 message 2004/02/13

[#2449] make install not getting through rdoc phase — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

7 messages 2004/02/16
[#2452] Re: make install not getting through rdoc phase — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/16

On Monday 16 February 2004 06:57, David A. Black wrote:
[#2450] Re: make install not getting through rdoc phase — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/16

Hi,
[#2451] Re: make install not getting through rdoc phase — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/02/16

Hi --
[#2453] Re: make install not getting through rdoc phase — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/16

Hi,
[#2454] Re: make install not getting through rdoc phase — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/02/16

Hi --
[#2459] Re: make install not getting through rdoc phase — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/17

On Monday 16 February 2004 10:19, David A. Black wrote:

[#2455] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby/lib, ruby: * lib/generator.rb: corrected doc format — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2004/02/17
[#2456] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby/lib, ruby: * lib/generator.rb: corrected doc format — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/17

[#2460] PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib.rb getopts.rb importenv.rb parsearg.rb — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

I raised this recently and got the go-ahead, except that a few days

2 messages 2004/02/18
[#2461] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib.rb getopts.rb importenv.rb parsearg.rb — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/18

Hi,

[#2463] ri --help output typos — Doug Kearns <djkea2@...>

Index: lib/rdoc/ri/ri_options.rb

2 messages 2004/02/19
[#2464] Re: [PATCH] ri --help output typos — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/19

[#2465] PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

This is a common approach I use to object initialization; I don't know

24 messages 2004/02/19
[#2468] Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/19

[#2473] Re: Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/20

Hi,
[#2474] Re: Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/20

[#2469] Re: Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/02/19

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 02:42:00 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2470] Re: Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — Carlos <angus@...> 2004/02/19

> > As more general suggestion. Could 'new' yield the new object is a block
[#2471] Re: Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/02/20

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:24:31 +0900, Carlos wrote:
[#2472] Re: Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/20

[#2475] Re: Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/02/20

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:28:58 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2477] Re: Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/20

[#2479] Re: Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/02/20

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:50:09 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2481] Re: Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/20

Hi,
[#2476] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/20

Hi,
[#2478] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — Alexander Bokovoy <a.bokovoy@...> 2004/02/20

On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 08:54:31PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2482] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/02/21

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2483] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/21

Hi,
[#2484] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/02/21

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2485] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — "J.Herre" <jlst@...> 2004/02/21

On Feb 20, 2004, at 4:33 PM, Joel VanderWerf wrote:
[#2486] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/02/21

J.Herre wrote:
[#2487] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — "J.Herre" <jlst@...> 2004/02/21

[#2489] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/02/21

J.Herre wrote:
[#2490] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — "J.Herre" <jlst@...> 2004/02/21

[#2488] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/21

Hi,
[#2480] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/20

On Friday, February 20, 2004, 10:54:31 PM, Yukihiro wrote:

[#2466] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — "Berger, Daniel" <djberge@...>

1 message 2004/02/19

[#2467] Nested popens under OSX — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

The following code fails under OSX:

2 messages 2004/02/19
[#2512] Re: Nested popens under OSX — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2004/02/26

[#2491] Exception not caught / require BUG — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2004/02/21
[#2492] Re: Exception not caught / require BUG — ts <decoux@...> 2004/02/21

>>>>> "L" == Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@scriptolutions.com> writes:

[#2493] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * dir.c (fnmatch): File.fnmatch with FNM_PATHNAME was broken — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

The commit described below, affecting HEAD, appears to be a bug fix.

2 messages 2004/02/24
[#2505] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * dir.c (fnmatch): File.fnmatch with FNM_PATHNAME was broken — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/02/25

Hi.

[#2494] rehash segfault — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>

I don't have a lot of information on this bug at this point, but

10 messages 2004/02/24
[#2495] Re: rehash segfault — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/24

Hi,
[#2498] Re: rehash segfault — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/02/24

On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 03:30:54AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2499] Re: rehash segfault — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/25

Hi,
[#2501] Re: rehash segfault — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/02/25

On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 05:44:30PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2502] Re: rehash segfault — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/25

Hi,
[#2503] Thread-safe hashes (was Re: rehash segfault) — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/02/25

On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 10:13:00PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2496] Re: rehash segfault — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...> 2004/02/24

On Feb 24, 2004, at 13:30, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2500] Re: rehash segfault — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/25

Hi,
[#2497] Re: rehash segfault — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/02/24

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#2504] foldl and foldr — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Sorry if I'm opening old wounds; I have a hard time believing that nobody has

6 messages 2004/02/25
[#2507] Re: foldl and foldr — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2004/02/25

[#2506] Re: foldl and foldr — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/02/25

foldl is available under the name inject.
[#2508] Re: foldl and foldr — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/25

On Wednesday 25 February 2004 09:53, Eivind Eklund wrote:
[#2509] Re: foldl and foldr — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/02/25

On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 12:05:50AM +0900, Sean E. Russell wrote:
[#2510] Re: foldl and foldr — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/25

On Wednesday 25 February 2004 11:57, Eivind Eklund wrote:

[#2511] trivial RDoc patch for array.c — Doug Kearns <djkea2@...>

Index: array.c

1 message 2004/02/26

[#2513] $-<char> variables — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

I couldn't find this in the Changelogs, so I thought I'd just ask.

5 messages 2004/02/26
[#2515] Re: $-<char> variables — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/27

Hi,
[#2517] Re: $-<char> variables — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/27

[#2518] Re: $-<char> variables — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/27

Hi,
[#2519] Re: $-<char> variables — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/27

[#2514] Possible bug in io.c — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

static void

2 messages 2004/02/26
[#2516] Re: Possible bug in io.c — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/27

Hi,

[#2520] Bugs in source: nightly-snapshot — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

I have just:

3 messages 2004/02/27
[#2527] Re: Bugs in source: nightly-snapshot — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/01

[#2528] Re: Bugs in source: nightly-snapshot — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/03/01

On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#2521] Intelligent eyes needed — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

I'm in the middle of updating the Pickaxe, and I wanted to try to

3 messages 2004/02/28
[#2523] Re: Intelligent eyes needed — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/02/28

On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2522] Re: Intelligent eyes needed — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/02/28

Hi --

Intelligent eyes needed

From: Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Date: 2004-02-28 15:04:58 UTC
List: ruby-core #2521 
I'm in the middle of updating the Pickaxe, and I wanted to try to 
explain better the differences between proc, Proc.new, and blocks. I 
also wanted to explain how break, next, and return work with blocks and 
procs.

I've come up with 
http://www.pragmaticprogrammer.com/extracts/blocks.pdf as my first pass 
at an explanation. If folks have time, I'd really appreciate comments, 
both on the accuracy (Matz?) and on how clear it is. Is the explanation 
correct? Is it as simple as possible? Have I covered all the cases?

This stuff is in the language reference section of the PickAxe, and so 
is supposed to be a little bit terse.

Cheers

Dave

In This Thread

Prev Next