[#2320] Problems in mathn, rational, complex, matrix — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
I received a message from Richard Graham mentioning a problem in the
[#2346] Patch for socket.c: control reverse lookup for every instance — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...>
Hi all
[#2357] Use the BasicSocket#do_not_reverse_lookup flag in Webrick — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...>
Hi
[#2367] Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
From ruby-dev summary:
Hi,
Hi,
By the way, this issue is about a matter of taste, so the debate is somewhat
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 02:58:22PM +0900, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
On Thursday, February 12, 2004, 8:18:32 PM, Mauricio wrote:
On Thursday 12 February 2004 04:37, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
On Friday, February 13, 2004, 12:44:15 AM, Sean wrote:
(Dave Thomas: there's a question for you in the second paragraph; if you're
[#2397] PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Index: cgi-lib.rb
* Gavin Sinclair (gsinclair@soyabean.com.au) wrote:
On Thursday, February 12, 2004, 11:39:37 PM, E wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
[#2422] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * lib/ftools.rb: documented — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
Hello,
[#2449] make install not getting through rdoc phase — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#2465] PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
This is a common approach I use to object initialization; I don't know
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 02:42:00 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
> > As more general suggestion. Could 'new' yield the new object is a block
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:24:31 +0900, Carlos wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Feb 20, 2004, at 4:33 PM, Joel VanderWerf wrote:
[#2494] rehash segfault — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>
I don't have a lot of information on this bug at this point, but
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 03:30:54AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2504] foldl and foldr — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>
Sorry if I'm opening old wounds; I have a hard time believing that nobody has
Bugs in source: nightly-snapshot
I have just:
grabbed the nightly snapshot
cvs updated my ruby-doc
built the snapshot.
and got:
parser.rb: mc.c.c.c.cc....c.......cc.....m...........
rexmlparser.rb: mc..c.
RDoc failure in ./lib/ruby/1.9/rss/rexmlparser.rb at or around line 44 column 29
Before reporting this, could you check that the file
you're documenting compiles cleanly--RDoc is not a
full Ruby parser, and gets confused easily if fed
invalid programs.
The internal error was:
/home/hgs/RUBY-SNAPSHOT/lib/ruby/1.9/rdoc/parsers/parse_rb.rb:2312:in `get_symbol_or_name': Name or symbol expected (got #<RubyToken::TkLPAREN:0x2f8d560>) (RuntimeError)
from /home/hgs/RUBY-SNAPSHOT/lib/ruby/1.9/rdoc/parsers/parse_rb.rb:2318:in `parse_alias'
from /home/hgs/RUBY-SNAPSHOT/lib/ruby/1.9/rdoc/parsers/parse_rb.rb:1683:in `parse_statements'
from /home/hgs/RUBY-SNAPSHOT/lib/ruby/1.9/rdoc/parsers/parse_rb.rb:1745:in `parse_class'
rubyunit.rb:
[...]
tkcanvas.rb: m..c....................................................m..............................c...........c..c.c.c...c......c.c.c.c.c.c.c.c.c.c........c.c............
tkbgerror.rb: m...
tkafter.rb: c................................
tk.rb: m.
lib/ruby/1.9/tk.rb:14:15: Couldn't find module None
RDoc failure in lib/ruby/1.9/tk.rb at or around line 14 column 15
Before reporting this, could you check that the file
you're documenting compiles cleanly--RDoc is not a
full Ruby parser, and gets confused easily if fed
invalid programs.
The internal error was:
brains hgs 12 %>
It was suggested that I report this here
Hugh