[#2320] Problems in mathn, rational, complex, matrix — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
I received a message from Richard Graham mentioning a problem in the
[#2346] Patch for socket.c: control reverse lookup for every instance — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...>
Hi all
[#2357] Use the BasicSocket#do_not_reverse_lookup flag in Webrick — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...>
Hi
[#2367] Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
From ruby-dev summary:
Hi,
Hi,
By the way, this issue is about a matter of taste, so the debate is somewhat
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 02:58:22PM +0900, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
On Thursday, February 12, 2004, 8:18:32 PM, Mauricio wrote:
On Thursday 12 February 2004 04:37, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
On Friday, February 13, 2004, 12:44:15 AM, Sean wrote:
(Dave Thomas: there's a question for you in the second paragraph; if you're
[#2397] PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Index: cgi-lib.rb
* Gavin Sinclair (gsinclair@soyabean.com.au) wrote:
On Thursday, February 12, 2004, 11:39:37 PM, E wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
[#2422] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * lib/ftools.rb: documented — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
Hello,
[#2449] make install not getting through rdoc phase — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#2465] PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
This is a common approach I use to object initialization; I don't know
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 02:42:00 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
> > As more general suggestion. Could 'new' yield the new object is a block
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:24:31 +0900, Carlos wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Feb 20, 2004, at 4:33 PM, Joel VanderWerf wrote:
[#2494] rehash segfault — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>
I don't have a lot of information on this bug at this point, but
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 03:30:54AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2504] foldl and foldr — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>
Sorry if I'm opening old wounds; I have a hard time believing that nobody has
rehash segfault
I don't have a lot of information on this bug at this point, but
figured I'd throw out what I do have, and see if it's enough to jog
someone's brain. I'll of course continue to gather more information as
I'm able and present it here.
I have code that looks like this in my application:
@cache = Set::new
def @cache.rehash
@hash.rehash
end
@cache.rehash is called whenever the cache is modified. I've gotten the
following segfault twice (in days of running):
/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/se/server/db/cache.rb:18: [BUG]
Segmentation fault
ruby 1.8.1 (2003-12-25) [i386-linux]
cache.rb line 18 is the @hash.rehash line. My ruby is configured as:
$ ruby -rrbconfig -e'p Config::CONFIG["configure_args"]'
"'--host=i386-linux' '--build=i386-linux' '--prefix=/usr'
'--mandir=/usr/share/man'
'--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--enable-pthread' 'CFLAGS=-g'
'build_alias=i386-linux'
'host_alias=i386-linux'"
My guess is that either there is some combination of keys and/or size
that triggers a rehash bug, or rehash is not completely thread-safe.
Any ideas?
TIA,
Nathaniel
<:((><