[#2320] Problems in mathn, rational, complex, matrix — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
I received a message from Richard Graham mentioning a problem in the
[#2346] Patch for socket.c: control reverse lookup for every instance — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...>
Hi all
[#2357] Use the BasicSocket#do_not_reverse_lookup flag in Webrick — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...>
Hi
[#2367] Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
From ruby-dev summary:
Hi,
Hi,
By the way, this issue is about a matter of taste, so the debate is somewhat
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 02:58:22PM +0900, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
On Thursday, February 12, 2004, 8:18:32 PM, Mauricio wrote:
On Thursday 12 February 2004 04:37, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
On Friday, February 13, 2004, 12:44:15 AM, Sean wrote:
(Dave Thomas: there's a question for you in the second paragraph; if you're
[#2397] PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Index: cgi-lib.rb
* Gavin Sinclair (gsinclair@soyabean.com.au) wrote:
On Thursday, February 12, 2004, 11:39:37 PM, E wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
[#2422] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * lib/ftools.rb: documented — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
Hello,
[#2449] make install not getting through rdoc phase — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#2465] PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
This is a common approach I use to object initialization; I don't know
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 02:42:00 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
> > As more general suggestion. Could 'new' yield the new object is a block
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:24:31 +0900, Carlos wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Feb 20, 2004, at 4:33 PM, Joel VanderWerf wrote:
[#2494] rehash segfault — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>
I don't have a lot of information on this bug at this point, but
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 03:30:54AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2504] foldl and foldr — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>
Sorry if I'm opening old wounds; I have a hard time believing that nobody has
Re: Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self)
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:50:09 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2004, at 23:59, Austin Ziegler wrote:
>> Would the presence of &blk immediately make super pretend to be super
>> {}?
> It _could_.... but whether it should is another matter :)
I think that what I'm uncomfortable with is the possible "magic" involved
here. I actually agree with the proposal and think that it's a good idea in
general; I'm just not comfortable with how we'd transition *to* this.
Then again, I just tried this in 1.8.0 (I'm too lazy to upgrade to 1.8.1
right at the moment :)) and got:
irb(main):001:0> class Foo
irb(main):002:1> def baz
irb(main):003:2> yield "Foo#baz" if block_given?
irb(main):004:2> end
irb(main):005:1> end
=> nil
irb(main):006:0> class Bar < Foo
irb(main):007:1> def baz
irb(main):008:2> yield "Bar#baz" if block_given?
irb(main):009:2> super
irb(main):010:2> end
irb(main):011:1> end
=> nil
irb(main):012:0> b = Bar.new
=> #<Bar:0x2803f00>
irb(main):013:0> b.baz { |a| puts a }
Bar#baz
Foo#baz
=> nil
So if we're yielding *and* calling the super of the method, we have to call
super {} unless we want the super to yield as well.
-austin
--
austin ziegler * austin@halostatue.ca * Toronto, ON, Canada
software designer * pragmatic programmer * 2004.02.20
* 15.11.47