ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#2320] Problems in mathn, rational, complex, matrix — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

I received a message from Richard Graham mentioning a problem in the

5 messages 2004/02/01

[#2321] Re: Problems in mathn, rational, complex, matrix — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2004/02/01

[#2322] Re: Problems in mathn, rational, complex, matrix — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/01

On Sunday, February 1, 2004, 7:02:31 PM, Mathieu wrote:

[#2323] Re: Problems in mathn, rational, complex, matrix — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/02/01

On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 18:11:50 +0900, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#2324] Re: Problems in mathn, rational, complex, matrix — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2004/02/01

[#2327] Ruby 2 Status — "BH - Brad Coish" <BCoish@...>

All:

1 message 2004/02/02

[#2328] CGI::Session.rb — emschwar@... (Eric Schwartz)

I'm sorry, I found a typo in my previous version of the patch. Here

2 messages 2004/02/02

[#2907] Re: [PATCH] CGI::Session.rb — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/19

Hi,

[#2335] rb_io_puts is strange — Elliott Hughes <ehughes@...>

i just tracked down some incorrect behavior (missing newlines in the output)

2 messages 2004/02/03

[#2337] Re: rb_io_puts is strange — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/03

Hi,

[#2336] REXML Bug in IOSource's initialize? — "Zachary P. Landau" <kapheine@...>

1 message 2004/02/03

[#2340] Re: rb_io_puts is strange — Elliott Hughes <ehughes@...>

3 messages 2004/02/04

[#2341] Re: rb_io_puts is strange — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/04

Hi,

[#2345] Re: rb_io_puts is strange — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2004/02/05

[#2342] Re: rb_io_puts is strange — Elliott Hughes <ehughes@...>

3 messages 2004/02/04

[#2343] Re: rb_io_puts is strange — "J.Herre" <jlst@...> 2004/02/04

[#2344] Re: rb_io_puts is strange — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/04

Hi,

[#2346] Patch for socket.c: control reverse lookup for every instance — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...>

Hi all

4 messages 2004/02/05

[#2347] Re: Patch for socket.c: control reverse lookup for every instance — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/05

Hi,

[#2348] Re: Patch for socket.c: control reverse lookup for every instance — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/06

Hi,

[#2351] Re: Patch for socket.c: control reverse lookup for every instance — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...> 2004/02/06

On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 08:40:14 +0900

[#2349] RDoc should recognise https:// links — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>

Patch attached.

2 messages 2004/02/06

[#2350] Re: RDoc should recognise https:// links — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/06

[#2352] Persistent IRB history — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...>

Hi all

4 messages 2004/02/06

[#2354] Re: [PATCH] Persistent IRB history — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/07

Hi,

[#2356] Re: [PATCH] Persistent IRB history — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...> 2004/02/07

On Sat, 7 Feb 2004 10:58:20 +0900

[#2358] Re: [PATCH] Persistent IRB history — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/07

Hi,

[#2353] RCR Mailing List — "T. Onoma" <transami@...>

This post is primarily directed to Matz, but is posted here for everyone to

3 messages 2004/02/06

[#2355] Re: RCR Mailing List — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2004/02/07

On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, T. Onoma wrote:

[#2359] Re: RCR Mailing List — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2004/02/08

On Saturday 07 February 2004 03:15 am, Chad Fowler wrote:

[#2357] Use the BasicSocket#do_not_reverse_lookup flag in Webrick — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...>

Hi

5 messages 2004/02/07

[#2360] Re: [PATCH] Use the BasicSocket#do_not_reverse_lookup flag in Webrick — "Kawaji, Shinya" <kawaji@...> 2004/02/09

Hi,

[#2361] Re: [PATCH] Use the BasicSocket#do_not_reverse_lookup flag in Webrick — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...> 2004/02/09

Hi,

[#2363] Re: [PATCH] Use the BasicSocket#do_not_reverse_lookup flag inWebrick — "Kawaji, Shinya" <kawaji@...> 2004/02/09

Hi,

[#2362] Re: [PATCH] Use the BasicSocket#do_not_reverse_lookup flag in Webrick — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/09

Hi,

[#2364] Maybe bug — "Dmitry V. Sabanin" <sdmitry@...>

Hi there

2 messages 2004/02/09

[#2365] Re: Maybe bug — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/09

Hi,

[#2366] Re: rb_io_puts is strange — Elliott Hughes <ehughes@...>

1 message 2004/02/11

[#2367] Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

From ruby-dev summary:

60 messages 2004/02/11

[#2368] Re: Standard libraries — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/11

On Wednesday 11 February 2004 14:36, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#2372] Re: Standard libraries — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/11

On Thursday, February 12, 2004, 7:36:18 AM, Sean wrote:

[#2369] Re: Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/11

[#2371] Re: Standard libraries — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/11

On Wednesday 11 February 2004 15:54, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#2373] Re: Standard libraries — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/11

Hi,

[#2374] Re: Standard libraries — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/11

> Hi,

[#2375] Re: Standard libraries — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/12

Hi,

[#2377] Re: Standard libraries — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

[#2382] Re: Standard libraries — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/12

Hi,

[#2388] Re: Standard libraries — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/02/12

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#2389] Re: Standard libraries — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

>> Here's the modified version of your criteria, that I can accept:

[#2400] Re: Standard libraries — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2004/02/12

On Thursday, 12 February 2004 at 15:29:48 +0900, why the lucky stiff wrote:

[#2390] Re: Standard libraries — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/12

Hi,

[#2421] Re: Standard libraries — "J.Herre" <jlst@...> 2004/02/13

[#2433] Re: Standard libraries — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/13

On Thursday 12 February 2004 20:13, J.Herre wrote:

[#2387] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/12

Hi,

[#2428] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/13

Hi,

[#2436] Re: Standard libraries — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2004/02/13

On Friday 13 February 2004 07:00, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:

[#2429] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/13

Hi,

[#2432] Re: Standard libraries — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/13

By the way, this issue is about a matter of taste, so the debate is somewhat

[#2437] Re: Standard libraries — "J.Herre" <jlst@...> 2004/02/13

[#2439] Re: Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/13

[#2442] Re: Standard libraries — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/13

On Saturday, February 14, 2004, 5:04:45 AM, Dave wrote:

[#2440] Re: Standard libraries — "J.Herre" <jlst@...> 2004/02/13

[#2441] Re: Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/13

[#2457] Re: Standard libraries — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/02/17

On Sat 14 Feb 2004 at 03:04:45 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#2458] Re: Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/17

[#2462] Re: Standard libraries — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/02/18

On Tue 17 Feb 2004 at 15:42:41 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#2430] Re: Standard libraries — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/13

>>From my experience, for good development, library user

[#2434] Re: Standard libraries — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/02/13

On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 03:14:49PM +0900, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:

[#2435] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/13

Hi,

[#2447] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/14

Hi,

[#2386] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/12

Hi,

[#2392] Re: Standard libraries — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/02/12

On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 02:58:22PM +0900, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:

[#2393] Re: Standard libraries — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

On Thursday, February 12, 2004, 8:18:32 PM, Mauricio wrote:

[#2401] Re: Standard libraries — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/12

On Thursday 12 February 2004 04:37, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#2405] Re: Standard libraries — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

On Friday, February 13, 2004, 12:44:15 AM, Sean wrote:

[#2410] Re: Standard libraries — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/12

(Dave Thomas: there's a question for you in the second paragraph; if you're

[#2412] Re: Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/12

[#2414] Re: Standard libraries — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/12

On Thursday 12 February 2004 11:54, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#2415] Re: Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/12

[#2420] Re: Standard libraries — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/13

On Thursday 12 February 2004 15:26, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#2424] Re: Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/13

[#2425] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/13

Hi,

[#2427] Re: Standard libraries — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/13

[#2426] Re: Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/13

[#2370] Re: Standard libraries — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2004/02/11

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#2376] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/12

Hi,

[#2378] Re: Standard libraries — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

> Hi,

[#2383] Re: Standard libraries — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/12

Hi,

[#2384] Re: Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/12

[#2379] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/12

Hi,

[#2381] Re: Standard libraries — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

> Hi,

[#2394] Re: Standard libraries — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/02/12

Hi --

[#2396] Re: Standard libraries — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/12

Hi,

[#2380] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/12

Hi,

[#2385] Re: Standard libraries — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

[NaHi:]

[#2391] Re: Standard libraries — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/12

Hi,

[#2431] Re: Standard libraries — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2004/02/13

[#2395] Comments on base64.rb — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

While adding documentation to base64.rb and backporting it to 1.8, I

1 message 2004/02/12

[#2397] PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

Index: cgi-lib.rb

15 messages 2004/02/12

[#2446] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/14

Hi,

[#2398] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — E F van de Laar <emiel@...> 2004/02/12

* Gavin Sinclair (gsinclair@soyabean.com.au) wrote:

[#2399] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

On Thursday, February 12, 2004, 11:39:37 PM, E wrote:

[#2417] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/02/12

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:02:47 +0900, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#2418] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

>> +warn "Warning: getopts is deprecated after Ruby 1.8.1; use getoptlong

[#2402] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/12

Hi,

[#2403] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

On Friday, February 13, 2004, 1:32:10 AM, Yukihiro wrote:

[#2406] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/12

Hi,

[#2404] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/02/12

Hi,

[#2407] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/12

On Friday, February 13, 2004, 1:56:25 AM, Hiroshi wrote:

[#2408] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/12

Hi,

[#2409] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — WATANABE Hirofumi <eban@...> 2004/02/12

Hi,

[#2413] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/12

Hi,

[#2419] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/13

Hi,

[#2411] Re: Comments on base64.rb — "Berger, Daniel" <djberge@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2004/02/12

[#2416] Re: Comments on base64.rb — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/02/12

On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:40:37 +0900, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#2422] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * lib/ftools.rb: documented — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>

Hello,

6 messages 2004/02/13

[#2423] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * lib/ftools.rb: documented — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2004/02/13

Hello,

[#2444] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * lib/ftools.rb: documented — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/14

On Friday, February 13, 2004, 1:19:20 PM, U.Nakamura wrote:

[#2445] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * lib/ftools.rb: documented — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/14

Hi,

[#2448] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * lib/ftools.rb: documented — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/14

On Saturday, February 14, 2004, 8:51:53 PM, Yukihiro wrote:

[#2443] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * lib/ftools.rb: documented — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/14

On Friday, February 13, 2004, 1:00:11 PM, U.Nakamura wrote:

[#2438] ri data location — "J.Herre" <jlst@...>

1 message 2004/02/13

[#2449] make install not getting through rdoc phase — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

7 messages 2004/02/16

[#2452] Re: make install not getting through rdoc phase — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/16

On Monday 16 February 2004 06:57, David A. Black wrote:

[#2450] Re: make install not getting through rdoc phase — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/16

Hi,

[#2451] Re: make install not getting through rdoc phase — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/02/16

Hi --

[#2453] Re: make install not getting through rdoc phase — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/16

Hi,

[#2454] Re: make install not getting through rdoc phase — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/02/16

Hi --

[#2459] Re: make install not getting through rdoc phase — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/17

On Monday 16 February 2004 10:19, David A. Black wrote:

[#2455] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby/lib, ruby: * lib/generator.rb: corrected doc format — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2004/02/17

[#2456] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby/lib, ruby: * lib/generator.rb: corrected doc format — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/17

[#2460] PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib.rb getopts.rb importenv.rb parsearg.rb — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

I raised this recently and got the go-ahead, except that a few days

2 messages 2004/02/18

[#2461] Re: PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib.rb getopts.rb importenv.rb parsearg.rb — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/18

Hi,

[#2463] ri --help output typos — Doug Kearns <djkea2@...>

Index: lib/rdoc/ri/ri_options.rb

2 messages 2004/02/19

[#2464] Re: [PATCH] ri --help output typos — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/19

[#2465] PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

This is a common approach I use to object initialization; I don't know

24 messages 2004/02/19

[#2468] Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/19

[#2473] Re: Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/20

Hi,

[#2474] Re: Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/20

[#2469] Re: Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/02/19

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 02:42:00 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#2470] Re: Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — Carlos <angus@...> 2004/02/19

> > As more general suggestion. Could 'new' yield the new object is a block

[#2471] Re: Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/02/20

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:24:31 +0900, Carlos wrote:

[#2472] Re: Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/20

[#2475] Re: Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/02/20

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:28:58 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#2477] Re: Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/20

[#2479] Re: Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/02/20

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:50:09 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#2481] Re: Change to #new (was OpenStruct#initialize to yield self) — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/20

Hi,

[#2476] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/20

Hi,

[#2478] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — Alexander Bokovoy <a.bokovoy@...> 2004/02/20

On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 08:54:31PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#2482] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/02/21

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#2483] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/21

Hi,

[#2484] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/02/21

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#2485] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — "J.Herre" <jlst@...> 2004/02/21

On Feb 20, 2004, at 4:33 PM, Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#2486] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/02/21

J.Herre wrote:

[#2487] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — "J.Herre" <jlst@...> 2004/02/21

[#2489] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/02/21

J.Herre wrote:

[#2490] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — "J.Herre" <jlst@...> 2004/02/21

[#2488] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/21

Hi,

[#2480] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/20

On Friday, February 20, 2004, 10:54:31 PM, Yukihiro wrote:

[#2466] Re: PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — "Berger, Daniel" <djberge@...>

1 message 2004/02/19

[#2467] Nested popens under OSX — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

The following code fails under OSX:

2 messages 2004/02/19

[#2512] Re: Nested popens under OSX — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2004/02/26

[#2491] Exception not caught / require BUG — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2004/02/21

[#2492] Re: Exception not caught / require BUG — ts <decoux@...> 2004/02/21

>>>>> "L" == Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@scriptolutions.com> writes:

[#2493] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * dir.c (fnmatch): File.fnmatch with FNM_PATHNAME was broken — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

The commit described below, affecting HEAD, appears to be a bug fix.

2 messages 2004/02/24

[#2505] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * dir.c (fnmatch): File.fnmatch with FNM_PATHNAME was broken — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/02/25

Hi.

[#2494] rehash segfault — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>

I don't have a lot of information on this bug at this point, but

10 messages 2004/02/24

[#2495] Re: rehash segfault — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/24

Hi,

[#2498] Re: rehash segfault — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/02/24

On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 03:30:54AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#2499] Re: rehash segfault — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/25

Hi,

[#2501] Re: rehash segfault — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/02/25

On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 05:44:30PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#2502] Re: rehash segfault — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/25

Hi,

[#2503] Thread-safe hashes (was Re: rehash segfault) — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/02/25

On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 10:13:00PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#2496] Re: rehash segfault — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...> 2004/02/24

On Feb 24, 2004, at 13:30, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#2500] Re: rehash segfault — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/25

Hi,

[#2497] Re: rehash segfault — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/02/24

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#2504] foldl and foldr — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Sorry if I'm opening old wounds; I have a hard time believing that nobody has

6 messages 2004/02/25

[#2507] Re: foldl and foldr — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2004/02/25

[#2506] Re: foldl and foldr — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/02/25

foldl is available under the name inject.

[#2508] Re: foldl and foldr — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/25

On Wednesday 25 February 2004 09:53, Eivind Eklund wrote:

[#2509] Re: foldl and foldr — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/02/25

On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 12:05:50AM +0900, Sean E. Russell wrote:

[#2510] Re: foldl and foldr — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/02/25

On Wednesday 25 February 2004 11:57, Eivind Eklund wrote:

[#2511] trivial RDoc patch for array.c — Doug Kearns <djkea2@...>

Index: array.c

1 message 2004/02/26

[#2513] $-<char> variables — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

I couldn't find this in the Changelogs, so I thought I'd just ask.

5 messages 2004/02/26

[#2515] Re: $-<char> variables — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/27

Hi,

[#2517] Re: $-<char> variables — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/27

[#2518] Re: $-<char> variables — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/27

Hi,

[#2519] Re: $-<char> variables — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/02/27

[#2514] Possible bug in io.c — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

static void

2 messages 2004/02/26

[#2516] Re: Possible bug in io.c — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/27

Hi,

[#2520] Bugs in source: nightly-snapshot — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

I have just:

3 messages 2004/02/27

[#2527] Re: Bugs in source: nightly-snapshot — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/01

[#2528] Re: Bugs in source: nightly-snapshot — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/03/01

On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#2521] Intelligent eyes needed — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

I'm in the middle of updating the Pickaxe, and I wanted to try to

3 messages 2004/02/28

[#2523] Re: Intelligent eyes needed — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/02/28

On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#2522] Re: Intelligent eyes needed — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/02/28

Hi --

Re: Standard libraries

From: "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...>

Date: 2004-02-12 04:32:22 UTC

List: ruby-core #2381

> Hi,
>
>> From: "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@soyabean.com.au>
>> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 12:41 PM
>
>> > RDoc style is a must?  I don't like documentation buried within a
>> source code (code duplication for me).
>>
>> RDoc is the standard way to document standard library files.  It's
>> only code duplication if you put code in the comments :)
>
> Anyway, duplication of something I don't like to see/maintain.

I'm still not sure what you think is being duplicated.


>> Still with 'soap', the SOAP module should have enough documentation to
>> show the user how to use it.  And they should get an idea of which
>> classes are important to them, and which ones are not.
>
> I added many samples to show "how to use it" but it could not be
> enough.  I thought I was going to write some simple document and
> import libs to ruby's CVS.  But I have no plan to write it inline
> to avoid the duplication.

If there is a document describing 'soap' somewhere on the Internet, then a
few comments above the SOAP module and a link to the document would be
sufficient for a user, wouldn't it?

> I think we should remove soap, wsdl and xsd modules if "complete"
> documentation is required.

I don't think so, given the above.  I have no plans/desires to clutter up
code if it's not beneficial.

But then again, are you maintaining ruby/lib/soap/* and 'soap4r'
separately?  I would prefer to see just one package, with unit tests,
samples, etc. rolled into the Ruby distribution.  But that's just a gut
feel, not based on experience or qualifications.

Cheers,
Gavin

Thread

In This Thread