[#2320] Problems in mathn, rational, complex, matrix — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
I received a message from Richard Graham mentioning a problem in the
[#2346] Patch for socket.c: control reverse lookup for every instance — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...>
Hi all
[#2357] Use the BasicSocket#do_not_reverse_lookup flag in Webrick — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...>
Hi
[#2367] Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
From ruby-dev summary:
Hi,
Hi,
By the way, this issue is about a matter of taste, so the debate is somewhat
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 02:58:22PM +0900, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
On Thursday, February 12, 2004, 8:18:32 PM, Mauricio wrote:
On Thursday 12 February 2004 04:37, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
On Friday, February 13, 2004, 12:44:15 AM, Sean wrote:
(Dave Thomas: there's a question for you in the second paragraph; if you're
[#2397] PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Index: cgi-lib.rb
* Gavin Sinclair (gsinclair@soyabean.com.au) wrote:
On Thursday, February 12, 2004, 11:39:37 PM, E wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
[#2422] Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby: * lib/ftools.rb: documented — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
Hello,
[#2449] make install not getting through rdoc phase — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#2465] PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
This is a common approach I use to object initialization; I don't know
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 02:42:00 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
> > As more general suggestion. Could 'new' yield the new object is a block
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:24:31 +0900, Carlos wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Feb 20, 2004, at 4:33 PM, Joel VanderWerf wrote:
[#2494] rehash segfault — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>
I don't have a lot of information on this bug at this point, but
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 03:30:54AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2504] foldl and foldr — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>
Sorry if I'm opening old wounds; I have a hard time believing that nobody has
Re: make install not getting through rdoc phase
Hi -- On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote: > Hi, > > At Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:20:56 +0900, > David A. Black wrote in [ruby-core:02451]: > > > > Generating RDoc documentation > > > > ./miniruby ./runruby.rb --extout=.ext -- "./bin/rdoc" --all --ri --op "/usr/local/lib/ruby-cvs//share/ri/1.9/system" "." > > > > /home/dblack/ruby/lib/rdoc/options.rb:4:in `require': No such file to load -- rdoc/ri/ri_paths (LoadError) > > > > > > What is output by followings? > > > > > > ./miniruby ./runruby.rb --extout=.ext -- -e 'puts $:' > > > > wobblini:~/ruby$ ./miniruby ./runruby.rb --extout=.ext -- -e 'puts $:' > > /home/dblack/ruby > > /home/dblack/ruby/lib > > /home/dblack/ruby/.ext > > /home/dblack/ruby/.ext/i686-linux > > /usr/local/lib/ruby-cvs//lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.9 > > /usr/local/lib/ruby-cvs//lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.9/i686-linux > > /usr/local/lib/ruby-cvs//lib/ruby/site_ruby > > /usr/local/lib/ruby-cvs//lib/ruby/1.9 > > /usr/local/lib/ruby-cvs//lib/ruby/1.9/i686-linux > > Of course, there is rdoc/ri/ri_paths.rb underneath > /home/dblack/ruby/lib? I'm curious that rdoc/options.rb is > found but rdoc/ri/ri_paths.rb is not. It's not there, but now I'm starting completely from scratch (not just 'cvs update')... and the result is... ... it works :-) I guess that means it was a problem with my CVS tree not getting updated properly. David -- David A. Black dblack@wobblini.net