[#102687] [Ruby master Bug#17666] Sleep in a thread hangs when Fiber.set_scheduler is set — arjundas.27586@...

Issue #17666 has been reported by arjunmdas (arjun das).

16 messages 2021/03/02

[#102776] [Ruby master Bug#17678] Ractors do not restart after fork — knuckles@...

Issue #17678 has been reported by ivoanjo (Ivo Anjo).

8 messages 2021/03/08

[#102797] [Ruby master Feature#17684] Remove `--disable-gems` from release version of Ruby — hsbt@...

Issue #17684 has been reported by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA).

17 messages 2021/03/10

[#102829] [Ruby master Bug#17718] a method paramaters object that can be pattern matched against — dsisnero@...

Issue #17718 has been reported by dsisnero (Dominic Sisneros).

9 messages 2021/03/11

[#102832] [Ruby master Misc#17720] Cirrus CI to check non-x86_64 architecture cases by own machines — jaruga@...

Issue #17720 has been reported by jaruga (Jun Aruga).

19 messages 2021/03/12

[#102850] [Ruby master Bug#17723] autoconf 2.70+ is not working with master branch — hsbt@...

Issue #17723 has been reported by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA).

11 messages 2021/03/14

[#102884] [Ruby master Bug#17725] Prepend Breaks Ability to Alias — josh@...

Issue #17725 has been reported by joshuadreed (Josh Reed).

14 messages 2021/03/16

[#102914] [Ruby master Bug#17728] [BUG] Segmentation fault at 0x0000000000000000 — denthebat@...

Issue #17728 has been reported by meliborn (Denis Denis).

13 messages 2021/03/18

[#102919] [Ruby master Bug#17730] Ruby on macOS transitively links to ~150 dylibs — rickmark@...

Issue #17730 has been reported by rickmark (Rick Mark).

10 messages 2021/03/18

[#103013] [Ruby master Bug#17748] Ruby 3.0 takes a long time to resolv DNS of nonexistent domains — xdmx@...

Issue #17748 has been reported by xdmx (Eric Bloom).

8 messages 2021/03/25

[#103026] [Ruby master Feature#17749] Const source location without name — tenderlove@...

Issue #17749 has been reported by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson).

10 messages 2021/03/25

[#103036] [Ruby master Misc#17751] Do these instructions (<<, +, [0..n]) modify the original string without creating copies? — cart4for1@...

Issue #17751 has been reported by stiuna (Juan Gregorio).

11 messages 2021/03/26

[#103040] [Ruby master Feature#17752] Enable -Wundef for C extensions in repository — eregontp@...

Issue #17752 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

23 messages 2021/03/26

[#103044] [Ruby master Feature#17753] Add Module#outer_scope — tenderlove@...

Issue #17753 has been reported by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson).

31 messages 2021/03/26

[#103088] [Ruby master Feature#17760] Where we should install a header file when `gem install --user`? — muraken@...

Issue #17760 has been reported by mrkn (Kenta Murata).

11 messages 2021/03/30

[#103102] [Ruby master Feature#17762] A simple way to trace object allocation — mame@...

Issue #17762 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

18 messages 2021/03/30

[#103105] [Ruby master Feature#17763] Implement cache for cvars — eileencodes@...

Issue #17763 has been reported by eileencodes (Eileen Uchitelle).

18 messages 2021/03/30

[ruby-core:103021] [Ruby master Feature#12125] Proposal: Shorthand operator for Object#method

From: cv-c@...
Date: 2021-03-25 15:25:19 UTC
List: ruby-core #103021
Issue #12125 has been updated by cvss (Kirill Vechera).


I agree, `to_h` is better, but for hashes only. When we have no such a shorthand with other classes or other constructors, we can:

```ruby
some_even_set = some_array&.select(&:even?)&.then(&Set.:new)
```

After writing some code in 2.7.0 with `.:` I feel that 

```ruby
[1, 2, 3].any?(&some_even_set.:include?)
```
is more clean than

```ruby
[1, 2, 3].any?{|x| some_even_set.include? x}
[1, 2, 3].any?{some_even_set.include? _1}
```



----------------------------------------
Feature #12125: Proposal: Shorthand operator for Object#method
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12125#change-91086

* Author: Papierkorb (Stefan Merettig)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
Hello,

The `&` operator lets one pass a `#call`-able object as block.

Really useful feature, but at the moment, if you want to pass a `Method` this way the syntax is not really concise:

```ruby
Dir["*/*.c"].map(&File.method(:basename))
```

More often than not, at least I end up writing this instead `.map{|a| File.basename a}` which isn't that great either.

Thus, I want to propose adding a short-hand operator to the ruby language, which simply calls `#method` on an `Object`.

It could look like this: `an_object->the_method` which is 100% equivalent to doing `an_object.method(:the_method)`

I'm reusing the `->` operator which is already used for the stabby lambda. But I think it makes sense: You have an object,
and from that object you point at a method to get it as `Method`.

With this, the example from above becomes: `Dir["*/*.c"].map(&File->basename)`

I attached a proof of concept patch. When you apply this to trunk, you can try the example above yourself.
Do note however that this PoC also breaks stabby lambda for the moment. I'll work on fixing that the following
days.

Thank you for reading,
Stefan.

---Files--------------------------------
method_shorthand.diff (740 Bytes)
dot-symbol.patch (554 Bytes)


-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread

Prev Next