[#103680] [Ruby master Bug#17843] Ruby on Rails error[BUG] Segmentation fault at 0x0000000000000110 ruby 3.0.1p64 (2021-04-05 revision 0fb782ee38) [x86_64-darwin15] (#42110) — nayaronfire@...

Issue #17843 has been reported by nayaronfire (kk nayar).

7 messages 2021/05/01

[#103686] [Ruby master Misc#17845] Windows Ruby - ucrt build? — Greg.mpls@...

Issue #17845 has been reported by MSP-Greg (Greg L).

22 messages 2021/05/01

[#103690] [Ruby master Bug#17846] Percent mode changes the output from ERB beyond what is documented — wolf@...

Issue #17846 has been reported by graywolf (Gray Wolf).

8 messages 2021/05/02

[#103724] [Ruby master Feature#17849] Fix Timeout.timeout so that it can be used in threaded Web servers — duerst@...

Issue #17849 has been reported by duerst (Martin Dst).

22 messages 2021/05/05

[#103756] [Ruby master Feature#17853] Add Thread#thread_id — komamitsu@...

Issue #17853 has been reported by komamitsu (Mitsunori Komatsu).

11 messages 2021/05/06

[#103801] [Ruby master Feature#17859] Start IRB when running just `ruby` — deivid.rodriguez@...

Issue #17859 has been reported by deivid (David Rodr刕uez).

18 messages 2021/05/12

[#103866] [Ruby master Bug#17866] Incompatible changes with Psych 4.0.0 — hsbt@...

Issue #17866 has been reported by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA).

13 messages 2021/05/17

[#103892] [Ruby master Bug#17871] TestGCCompact#test_ast_compacts test failing again — jaruga@...

Issue #17871 has been reported by jaruga (Jun Aruga).

11 messages 2021/05/19

[#103912] [Ruby master Bug#17873] Update of default gems in Ruby 3.1 — hsbt@...

Issue #17873 has been reported by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA).

38 messages 2021/05/20

[#103971] [Ruby master Bug#17880] [BUG] We are killing the stack canary set by `opt_setinlinecache` — jean.boussier@...

Issue #17880 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

8 messages 2021/05/22

[#103974] [Ruby master Feature#17881] Add a Module#const_added callback — jean.boussier@...

Issue #17881 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

29 messages 2021/05/22

[#104004] [Ruby master Feature#17883] Load bundler/setup earlier to make `bundle exec ruby -r` respect Gemfile — mame@...

Issue #17883 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

21 messages 2021/05/24

[#104109] [Ruby master Feature#17930] Add column information into error backtrace — mame@...

Issue #17930 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

34 messages 2021/05/31

[ruby-core:103908] [Ruby master Bug#17767] `Cloned ENV` inconsistently returns `ENV` or `self`

From: nobu@...
Date: 2021-05-20 07:52:09 UTC
List: ruby-core #103908
Issue #17767 has been updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada).


Cloned `ENV` accesses/modifies the process global environment variables, as well as `ENV` itself, however the codes we found expect these are different.
So I propose `ENV.clone` and `ENV.dup` should raise an exception.

----------------------------------------
Bug #17767: `Cloned ENV` inconsistently returns `ENV` or `self`
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17767#change-92037

* Author: kachick (Kenichi Kamiya)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* ruby -v: ruby 3.0.0p0 (2020-12-25 revision 95aff21468) [x86_64-darwin20]
* Backport: 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
GH-PR: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/4344

Is this an expected behavior?  

```console
$ ruby -v
ruby 3.0.0p0 (2020-12-25 revision 95aff21468) [x86_64-darwin20]
```

```ruby
cloned_env = ENV.clone

p ENV.each_key{}.equal?(ENV) #=> true
p cloned_env.each_key{}.equal?(cloned_env) #=> true

ENV.delete('TEST')

err = ENV.fetch('TEST') rescue $!
p err.receiver.equal?(ENV) #=> true
err = cloned_env.fetch('TEST') rescue $!
p err.receiver.equal?(cloned_env) #=> false

ENV['TEST'] = 'TRUE'
p ENV.select!{ false }.equal?(ENV) #=> true

cloned_env['TEST'] = 'TRUE'
p cloned_env.select!{ false }.equal?(cloned_env) #=> false
```

I guess ruby don't care `Cloned ENV` objects.
Yes, anyone basically do not write these code.
But the behaviors looks weird to me.  

Should block to clone?
Should return ENV?
Should return self?

I think `they return self` makes consistently behaviors and does not break compatibilities.
So I have created this PR  



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread