From: fxn@... Date: 2021-04-17T08:04:41+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:103496] [Ruby master Feature#17753] Add Module#namespace Issue #17753 has been updated by fxn (Xavier Noria). In my view, the way to implement the use case that matches Ruby is to go downwards. Module has many constants, that is the Ruby model, so instead of ```ruby ObjectSpace.each_object(Class) do |k| k.outer_scope.constants end ``` you'd write ```ruby ObjectSpace.each_object(Module) do |mod| mod.constants.each do |cname| # Do something with cname. end end ``` Alternatively, Recurse starting at `Object` (would miss anonymous modules with constants). ---------------------------------------- Feature #17753: Add Module#namespace https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17753#change-91592 * Author: tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- Given code like this: ```ruby module A module B class C; end class D; end end end ``` We can get from `C` to `B` like `C.outer_scope`, or to `A` like `C.outer_scope.outer_scope`. I want to use this in cases where I don't know the outer scope, but I want to find constants that are "siblings" of a constant. For example, I can do `A::B::C.outer_scope.constants` to find the list of "sibling" constants to `C`. I want to use this feature when walking objects and introspecting. For example: ```ruby ObjectSpace.each_object(Class) do |k| p siblings: k.outer_scope.constants end ``` I've attached a patch that implements this feature, and there is a pull request on GitHub [here](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/4326). ---Files-------------------------------- 0001-Add-Module-outer_scope.patch (5.93 KB) 0001-Add-Module-namespace.patch (5.89 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: