[#109207] [Ruby master Feature#18915] New error class: NotImplementedYetError or scope change for NotImplementedYet — Quintasan <noreply@...>
Issue #18915 has been reported by Quintasan (Michał Zając).
18 messages
2022/07/14
[ruby-core:109108] [Ruby master Feature#17753] Add Module#namespace
From:
"ioquatix (Samuel Williams)" <noreply@...>
Date:
2022-07-01 06:52:15 UTC
List:
ruby-core #109108
Issue #17753 has been updated by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).
@tenderlovemaking what about some kind of "uplevel" concept for name:
```ruby
class A::B::C::MyClass; end
A::B::C::MyClass.name(0) # -> "MyClass"
A::B::C::MyClass.name(1) # -> "C::MyClass"
A::B::C::MyClass.name(-1) # -> "A::B::C"
A::B::C::MyClass.name(-2) # -> "A::B"
```
etc
----------------------------------------
Feature #17753: Add Module#namespace
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17753#change-98255
* Author: tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
Given code like this:
```ruby
module A
module B
class C; end
class D; end
end
end
```
We can get from `C` to `B` like `C.outer_scope`, or to `A` like
`C.outer_scope.outer_scope`.
I want to use this in cases where I don't know the outer scope, but I
want to find constants that are "siblings" of a constant. For example,
I can do `A::B::C.outer_scope.constants` to find the list of "sibling"
constants to `C`. I want to use this feature when walking objects and
introspecting. For example:
```ruby
ObjectSpace.each_object(Class) do |k|
p siblings: k.outer_scope.constants
end
```
I've attached a patch that implements this feature, and there is a pull request on GitHub [here](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/4326).
---Files--------------------------------
0001-Add-Module-outer_scope.patch (5.93 KB)
0001-Add-Module-namespace.patch (5.89 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>