From: "nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)" Date: 2022-07-05T05:37:25+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:109139] [Ruby master Bug#18893] Don't redefine memcpy(3) Issue #18893 has been updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada). Do we need to force the function to be inlined? ```patch diff --git a/include/ruby/internal/memory.h b/include/ruby/internal/memory.h index aa3464465da..0c9fa17ee92 100644 --- a/include/ruby/internal/memory.h +++ b/include/ruby/internal/memory.h @@ -649,6 +649,7 @@ RBIMPL_SYMBOL_EXPORT_BEGIN() RBIMPL_ATTR_NOALIAS() RBIMPL_ATTR_NONNULL((1)) RBIMPL_ATTR_RETURNS_NONNULL() +RBIMPL_ATTR_FORCEINLINE() /* At least since 2004, glibc's annotates memcpy to be * __attribute__((__nonnull__(1, 2))). However it is safe to pass NULL to the * source pointer, if n is 0. Let's wrap memcpy. */ @@ -664,7 +665,7 @@ ruby_nonempty_memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n) } RBIMPL_SYMBOL_EXPORT_END() #undef memcpy -#define memcpy ruby_nonempty_memcpy +#define memcpy(dest, src, n) ruby_nonempty_memcpy(dest, src, n) #endif #endif /* RBIMPL_MEMORY_H */ ``` ---------------------------------------- Bug #18893: Don't redefine memcpy(3) https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18893#change-98280 * Author: alx (Alejandro Colomar) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe) * ruby -v: ruby 3.0.4p208 (2022-04-12 revision 3fa771dded) [x86_64-linux-gnu] * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- It is Undefined Behavior, by any standard ever issued. See what I have in my system right now: ``` alx@asus5775:/usr/include$ grepc memcpy ./string.h:43: extern void *memcpy (void *__restrict __dest, const void *__restrict __src, size_t __n) __THROW __nonnull ((1, 2)); ./x86_64-linux-gnu/ruby-3.0.0/rb_mjit_min_header-3.0.4.h:1520: extern void *memcpy (void *__restrict __dest, const void *__restrict __src, size_t __n) __attribute__ ((__nothrow__ , __leaf__)) __attribute__ ((__nonnull__ (1, 2))); ./x86_64-linux-gnu/ruby-3.0.0/rb_mjit_min_header-3.0.4.h:1670: extern __inline __attribute__ ((__always_inline__)) __attribute__ ((__gnu_inline__)) __attribute__ ((__artificial__)) void * __attribute__ ((__nothrow__ , __leaf__)) memcpy (void *__restrict __dest, const void *__restrict __src, size_t __len) { return __builtin___memcpy_chk (__dest, __src, __len, __builtin_object_size (__dest, 0)); } ./ruby-3.0.0/ruby/internal/memory.h:278: #define memcpy ruby_nonempty_memcpy ./x86_64-linux-gnu/ruby-3.0.0/rb_mjit_min_header-3.0.4.h:22679: #define memcpy ruby_nonempty_memcpy $ grepc ruby_nonempty_memcpy ./ruby-3.0.0/ruby/internal/memory.h:266: static inline void * ruby_nonempty_memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n) { if (n) { return memcpy(dest, src, n); } else { return dest; } } ./x86_64-linux-gnu/ruby-3.0.0/rb_mjit_min_header-3.0.4.h:5673: __attribute__((__nonnull__ (1))) __attribute__((__returns_nonnull__)) static inline void * ruby_nonempty_memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n) { if (n) { return memcpy(dest, src, n); } else { return dest; } } ``` Some code that I maintain includes some ruby headers, which end up defining memcpy(3) to that thing. Then, my code calls memcpy(3) from a function, which happens to be inline (yes, inline, not static inline, which is a horrible thing), and I get an error from the compiler, for using a static function within a non-static inline function. So, I'd like you to please remove that definition from public headers, and refrain from redefining any ISO C functions. If not, please define it to something not broken (and yes, static inline is broken, as it produces duplicated code when not inlined; you could use [[gnu::always_inline]] if you want to keep static, but don't). Just C99 inline would be reasonable. See also: Thanks, Alex -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: