[#112457] [Ruby master Feature#19443] Cache `Process.pid` — "byroot (Jean Boussier) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Issue #19443 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).
16 messages
2023/02/16
[#112584] [Ruby master Feature#19465] [PATCH] reuse open(2) from rb_file_load_ok on POSIX-like system — "normalperson (Eric Wong) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Issue #19465 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
9 messages
2023/02/25
[#112595] [Ruby master Feature#19465] [PATCH] reuse open(2) from rb_file_load_ok on POSIX-like system
— "nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
2023/02/25
SXNzdWUgIzE5NDY1IGhhcyBiZWVuIHVwZGF0ZWQgYnkgbm9idSAoTm9idXlvc2hpIE5ha2FkYSku
[#112613] Re: [Ruby master Feature#19465] [PATCH] reuse open(2) from rb_file_load_ok on POSIX-like system
— Eric Wong via ruby-core <ruby-core@...>
2023/02/26
"nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#112615] Re: [Ruby master Feature#19465] [PATCH] reuse open(2) from rb_file_load_ok on POSIX-like system
— SHIBATA Hiroshi via ruby-core <ruby-core@...>
2023/02/27
MzUxMzZlMWU5YzIzMmFkN2EwMzQwN2I5OTJiMmU4NmI2ZGY0M2Y2MyBpcyBicm9rZW4gd2l0aCBg
[#112626] Re: [Ruby master Feature#19465] [PATCH] reuse open(2) from rb_file_load_ok on POSIX-like system
— Eric Wong via ruby-core <ruby-core@...>
2023/02/28
```
[ruby-core:112277] [Ruby master Feature#17753] Add Module#namespace
From:
"fxn (Xavier Noria) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Date:
2023-02-08 07:54:51 UTC
List:
ruby-core #112277
Issue #17753 has been updated by fxn (Xavier Noria).
Yeah, I believe the feature makes sense and can be useful, and the proposed implementation that keeps a pointer is well-defined (vs what AS does). Also consistent with `Module#name`, as you said.
My observations above were more related to the name `namespace` I think, because we are defining "the class or module object that holded the constant to which I was initially assigned, if any". That is weaker.
Regarding your proposal, in English would be `parent_module` right?
Let me add something, this is practical, but the Ruby model suffers just a little bit in my view. Let me explain.
To me:
```ruby
module M
X = String.new
end
module N
X = Module.new
end
```
are essentially the same, Ruby objects stored in places. As we all know, the Ruby model is quite unconstrained, which makes it beautiful, but also weaker in a logical sense.
So, there is a part of me that believes for consistency the string object should also respond to `parent_module`, which is a weird derivation. (I am playing reductio at absurdum here, no proposing that!).
However, maybe in this case practicality can win over a pure and spherical language model, I don't know :).
----------------------------------------
Feature #17753: Add Module#namespace
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17753#change-101709
* Author: tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
Given code like this:
```ruby
module A
module B
class C; end
class D; end
end
end
```
We can get from `C` to `B` like `C.outer_scope`, or to `A` like
`C.outer_scope.outer_scope`.
I want to use this in cases where I don't know the outer scope, but I
want to find constants that are "siblings" of a constant. For example,
I can do `A::B::C.outer_scope.constants` to find the list of "sibling"
constants to `C`. I want to use this feature when walking objects and
introspecting. For example:
```ruby
ObjectSpace.each_object(Class) do |k|
p siblings: k.outer_scope.constants
end
```
I've attached a patch that implements this feature, and there is a pull request on GitHub [here](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/4326).
---Files--------------------------------
0001-Add-Module-outer_scope.patch (5.93 KB)
0001-Add-Module-namespace.patch (5.89 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
______________________________________________
ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/