[#102687] [Ruby master Bug#17666] Sleep in a thread hangs when Fiber.set_scheduler is set — arjundas.27586@...

Issue #17666 has been reported by arjunmdas (arjun das).

16 messages 2021/03/02

[#102776] [Ruby master Bug#17678] Ractors do not restart after fork — knuckles@...

Issue #17678 has been reported by ivoanjo (Ivo Anjo).

8 messages 2021/03/08

[#102797] [Ruby master Feature#17684] Remove `--disable-gems` from release version of Ruby — hsbt@...

Issue #17684 has been reported by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA).

17 messages 2021/03/10

[#102829] [Ruby master Bug#17718] a method paramaters object that can be pattern matched against — dsisnero@...

Issue #17718 has been reported by dsisnero (Dominic Sisneros).

9 messages 2021/03/11

[#102832] [Ruby master Misc#17720] Cirrus CI to check non-x86_64 architecture cases by own machines — jaruga@...

Issue #17720 has been reported by jaruga (Jun Aruga).

19 messages 2021/03/12

[#102850] [Ruby master Bug#17723] autoconf 2.70+ is not working with master branch — hsbt@...

Issue #17723 has been reported by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA).

11 messages 2021/03/14

[#102884] [Ruby master Bug#17725] Prepend Breaks Ability to Alias — josh@...

Issue #17725 has been reported by joshuadreed (Josh Reed).

14 messages 2021/03/16

[#102914] [Ruby master Bug#17728] [BUG] Segmentation fault at 0x0000000000000000 — denthebat@...

Issue #17728 has been reported by meliborn (Denis Denis).

13 messages 2021/03/18

[#102919] [Ruby master Bug#17730] Ruby on macOS transitively links to ~150 dylibs — rickmark@...

Issue #17730 has been reported by rickmark (Rick Mark).

10 messages 2021/03/18

[#103013] [Ruby master Bug#17748] Ruby 3.0 takes a long time to resolv DNS of nonexistent domains — xdmx@...

Issue #17748 has been reported by xdmx (Eric Bloom).

8 messages 2021/03/25

[#103026] [Ruby master Feature#17749] Const source location without name — tenderlove@...

Issue #17749 has been reported by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson).

10 messages 2021/03/25

[#103036] [Ruby master Misc#17751] Do these instructions (<<, +, [0..n]) modify the original string without creating copies? — cart4for1@...

Issue #17751 has been reported by stiuna (Juan Gregorio).

11 messages 2021/03/26

[#103040] [Ruby master Feature#17752] Enable -Wundef for C extensions in repository — eregontp@...

Issue #17752 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

23 messages 2021/03/26

[#103044] [Ruby master Feature#17753] Add Module#outer_scope — tenderlove@...

Issue #17753 has been reported by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson).

31 messages 2021/03/26

[#103088] [Ruby master Feature#17760] Where we should install a header file when `gem install --user`? — muraken@...

Issue #17760 has been reported by mrkn (Kenta Murata).

11 messages 2021/03/30

[#103102] [Ruby master Feature#17762] A simple way to trace object allocation — mame@...

Issue #17762 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

18 messages 2021/03/30

[#103105] [Ruby master Feature#17763] Implement cache for cvars — eileencodes@...

Issue #17763 has been reported by eileencodes (Eileen Uchitelle).

18 messages 2021/03/30

[ruby-core:102718] [Ruby master Feature#17660] Expose information about which basic methods have been redefined

From: daniel@...42.com
Date: 2021-03-02 15:31:02 UTC
List: ruby-core #102718
Issue #17660 has been updated by Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme).


Does this work with refinements?

```ruby
module X
  refine Integer do
    def +(x); x ** self; end
  end
end
```

In that case `RubyVM.redefined_basic_methods` should only return `{Integer=>[:+]}` if it's called from a context where the refinement is active? Or is this irrelevant to the use case? I'm not sure what's the use case precisely. Is the purpose only to forbid redefinitions that would negatively affect performance?


----------------------------------------
Feature #17660: Expose information about which basic methods have been redefined
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17660#change-90714

* Author: tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
I would like to tell if code is redefining methods that can impact
MRI's optimizations.  This commit exposes which basic methods have been
redefined.  For example:

```ruby
class Integer
  def +(x); x ** self; end
end

p RubyVM.redefined_methods # => {Integer=>[:+]}
```

This will allow us to prevent basic method redefinitions from happening
by checking for them in CI environments.  For example:

```ruby
Minitest.after_run {
  fail "Basic methods have been redefine" if RubyVM.redefined_methods.any?
}
```

---Files--------------------------------
0001-Expose-information-about-which-basic-methods-have-be.patch (3.89 KB)


-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread

Prev Next