[#100689] [Ruby master Feature#17303] Make webrick to bundled gems or remove from stdlib — hsbt@...
Issue #17303 has been reported by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA).
11 messages
2020/11/02
[#100852] [Ruby master Feature#17326] Add Kernel#must! to the standard library — zimmerman.jake@...
SXNzdWUgIzE3MzI2IGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IGpleiAoSmFrZSBaaW1tZXJtYW4pLg0K
24 messages
2020/11/14
[#100930] [Ruby master Feature#17333] Enumerable#many? — masafumi.o1988@...
Issue #17333 has been reported by okuramasafumi (Masafumi OKURA).
10 messages
2020/11/18
[#101071] [Ruby master Feature#17342] Hash#fetch_set — hunter_spawn@...
Issue #17342 has been reported by MaxLap (Maxime Lapointe).
26 messages
2020/11/25
[ruby-core:100907] [Ruby master Feature#17312] New methods in Enumerable and Enumerator::Lazy: flatten, product, compact
From:
zverok.offline@...
Date:
2020-11-17 15:50:26 UTC
List:
ruby-core #100907
Issue #17312 has been updated by zverok (Victor Shepelev). @mame @Dan0042 Oh, you are right, starting to think from `Enumerable::Lazy` perspective I've missed a huge incompatibility introduced by `flatten`. @mame I'll split into several proposals+patches: `Enumerable#compact`, and, I am starting to think now, maybe `Enumerator#flatten` would make some sense. As for `#product`, I just added it for completeness (as a method which also can work with unidirectional enumeration), I can't from the top of my head remember if I needed it some time in the past. ---------------------------------------- Feature #17312: New methods in Enumerable and Enumerator::Lazy: flatten, product, compact https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17312#change-88559 * Author: zverok (Victor Shepelev) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- (The offspring of #16987, which was too vague/philosophical) I propose to add to `Enumerable` and `Enumerator::Lazy` the following methods: * `compact` * `product` * `flatten` All of them can be performed with a one-way enumerator. All of them make sense for situations other than "just an array". All of them can be used for processing large sequences, and therefore meaningful to add to `Lazy`. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>