[#100689] [Ruby master Feature#17303] Make webrick to bundled gems or remove from stdlib — hsbt@...
Issue #17303 has been reported by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA).
11 messages
2020/11/02
[#100852] [Ruby master Feature#17326] Add Kernel#must! to the standard library — zimmerman.jake@...
Issue #17326 has been reported by jez (Jake Zimmerman).
24 messages
2020/11/14
[#100930] [Ruby master Feature#17333] Enumerable#many? — masafumi.o1988@...
Issue #17333 has been reported by okuramasafumi (Masafumi OKURA).
10 messages
2020/11/18
[#101071] [Ruby master Feature#17342] Hash#fetch_set — hunter_spawn@...
Issue #17342 has been reported by MaxLap (Maxime Lapointe).
26 messages
2020/11/25
[ruby-core:100998] [Ruby master Bug#10845] Subclassing String
From:
naruse@...
Date:
2020-11-21 05:35:15 UTC
List:
ruby-core #100998
Issue #10845 has been updated by naruse (Yui NARUSE).
In 2.7 we break large compatibilities, and this tickets breaks Rails again.
"Rails master already fixes it" doesn't care the problem; we breaks compatibility.
Breaking compatibility itself is not problem, but we can provide very small benefit for Rails application in 2.7 and 3.0.
We only provide disadvantages in recent versions.
Ractor and types are great milestone for future Rails, but they are not for Rails at this time.
I'm serious about the motivation of upgrading to Ruby 3.0 for Rails users.
I worry that so much.
----------------------------------------
Bug #10845: Subclassing String
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10845#change-88665
* Author: sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada)
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
* ruby -v: 2.2
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
If I make a subclass of `String`, the method `*` returns an instance of that class.
~~~ruby
class MyString < String
end
MyString.new("foo").*(2).class #=> MyString
~~~
This is different from other similar operations like `+` and `%`, which return a `String` instance.
~~~ruby
MyString.new("foo").+("bar").class #=> String
MyString.new("%{foo}").%(foo: "bar").class #=> String
~~~
I don't see clear reason why `*` is to be different from `+` and `%`, and thought that perhaps either the behaviour with `*` is a bug, or the behaviour with `+` and `%` is a bug.
Or, is a reason why they are different?
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>