From: eregontp@... Date: 2020-11-20T12:40:01+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:100975] [Ruby master Feature#17336] using refined: do ... end Issue #17336 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze). How about: ```ruby class Foo using do refine Array do def flat_map!(&block) replace(flat_map(&block)) end end refine String do ... end end ``` So let `using` take a block instead of a positional argument. That way, it's also possible to refine multiple classes/modules at once, which is often better than multiple `using` calls (notably, such methods can use the refinements of each other and it's more concise) ---------------------------------------- Feature #17336: using refined: do ... end https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17336#change-88638 * Author: k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- ## Problem When we need a monkey patch which is used only in a single file, we'd like to define a refinement and use it in the same place. The problem is that it needs deep indentation and `Module.new { ... }` which feels redundant. ```rb class Foo using Module.new { refine Array do def flat_map!(&block) replace(flat_map(&block)) end end } # ... end ``` @tagomoris proposed an idea to reduce indentation and remove `Module.new { ... }`. This looks pretty convenient, but I want to write `do ... end`, which would make it a block of `using` here, because we almost always use `... end` for defining methods or modules. ```rb module Kernel def refined(mod, &block) Module.new do refine(mod, &block) end end end class Foo using refined(Array) { def flat_map!(&block) replace(flat_map(&block)) end } # ... end ``` ## Proposal How about supporting this? Because `using` currently doesn't take a block, it doesn't conflict with the existing syntax. ```rb class Foo using refined: Array do def flat_map!(&block) replace(flat_map(&block)) end end # ... end ``` This syntax is based on ideas of @tagomoris and @znz . -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: