ruby-talk

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#839] Ruby as an extension language ? — Artur Matos <ei96024@...>

Hi,

3 messages 1999/10/03

[#842] Ruby as an extension language ? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/10/03

Artur Matos writes:

[#843] Re: Ruby as an extension language ? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/10/03

Hi,

[#840] separator of RD block — Minero Aoki <aamine@...>

Hi, I propose new topic about RD today.

3 messages 1999/10/03

[#841] separator of RD block — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/10/03

Minero Aoki writes:

[#845] Re: separator of RD block — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 1999/10/08

Hi,

[#844] Request for WinGKR — ARIMA Yasuhiro <fit0298@...>

1 message 1999/10/05

[#846] Ruby on Windows NT, anybody? — "Francois Le Coguiec" <francois_le_coguiec@...>

Hello,

2 messages 1999/10/16

[#847] Re: Ruby on Windows NT, anybody? — ARIMA Yasuhiro <fit0298@...> 1999/10/16

Hi.

[#848] Re: Ruby on Windows NT, anybody? — "Francois Le Coguiec" <francois_le_coguiec@...>

Arima,

2 messages 1999/10/17

[#849] Re: Ruby on Windows NT, anybody? — ARIMA Yasuhiro <fit0298@...> 1999/10/17

Hi.

[#850] Re: Ruby on Windows NT, anybody? — "Francois Le Coguiec" <francois_le_coguiec@...>

Latest attempts...

1 message 1999/10/18

[#851] Re: Ruby on Windows NT. Yes! — "Francois Le Coguiec" <francois_le_coguiec@...>

I downloaded the sources, ran win32\ntsetup.bat, then nmake...

1 message 1999/10/18

[#852] Ruby/GTK 0.22 released — Hiroshi IGARASHI <igarashi@...>

Hi all,

1 message 1999/10/20

[#853] Vote will be restarted — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)

On Icon competition

1 message 1999/10/21

[#854] Berkeley DB — ts <decoux@...>

2 messages 1999/10/22

[#855] Re: Berkeley DB — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/10/22

Hi,

[#856] Re: Berkeley DB — ts <decoux@...>

1 message 1999/10/22

[#857] Re: Berkeley DB — ts <decoux@...>

> Content-Length: 0

3 messages 1999/10/22

[#858] Re: Berkeley DB — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/10/22

Hi,

[#859] Re: Berkeley DB — ts <decoux@...> 1999/10/22

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp> writes:

[#860] ruby 1.5 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Hi,

3 messages 1999/10/22

[#861] Re: ruby 1.5 — Masaki Fukushima <fukusima@...> 1999/10/22

Hi,

[#862] Re: ruby 1.5 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/10/22

Hi,

[#863] RDtool-0.5.0 — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp>

Hi,

18 messages 1999/10/23

[#864] Re: RDtool-0.5.0 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/10/26

Hi,

[#865] Re: RDtool-0.5.0 — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/10/26

Hi,

[#866] Re: RDtool-0.5.0 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/10/26

Hi,

[#892] Re: RDtool-0.5.0 — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/10/31

Hi,

[#894] Re: RDtool-0.5.0 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/11/01

Hi,

[#896] Re: RDtool-0.5.0 — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/11/01

Hi,

[#905] Re: RDtool-0.5.0 — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/11/04

Hi,

[#906] Re: RDtool-0.5.0 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/11/04

Hi,

[#907] Re: RDtool-0.5.0 — Kazuhiro HIWADA <hiwada@...> 1999/11/04

Hi,

[#908] Re: RDtool-0.5.0 — kjana@... (YANAGAWA Kazuhisa) 1999/11/05

In message <19991105025532K.hiwada@kuee.kyoto-u.ac.jp>

[#910] Re: RDtool-0.5.0 — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/11/06

Hi,

[#912] Re: RDtool-0.5.0 — kjana@... (YANAGAWA Kazuhisa) 1999/11/06

In message <199911061555.AAA02008@mail.yb3.so-net.ne.jp>

[#915] Re: RDtool-0.5.0 — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/11/09

Hi,

[#918] Re: RDtool-0.5.0 — kjana@... (YANAGAWA Kazuhisa) 1999/11/10

At first, I have to say what I've written on labels/references is

[#953] Re: RDtool-0.5.0 — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/12/04

Hi,

[#911] Re: RDtool-0.5.0 — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/11/06

Hi,

[#916] Re: RDtool-0.5.0 — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/11/09

Hi,

[#867] call with a Proc — ts <decoux@...>

11 messages 1999/10/28

[#868] Re: call with a Proc — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/10/28

Hi,

[#869] Re: call with a Proc — ts <decoux@...> 1999/10/28

>>>>> "G" == GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp> writes:

[#870] Re: call with a Proc — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/10/28

In message "[ruby-talk:00869] Re: call with a Proc"

[#876] Re: call with a Proc — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 1999/10/28

Hi gotoken,

[#871] call with a Proc — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/10/28

ts writes:

[#872] Re: call with a Proc — ts <decoux@...> 1999/10/28

>>>>> "C" == Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@gmx.net> writes:

[#873] Re: call with a Proc — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/10/28

Hi,

[#874] Re: call with a Proc — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/10/28

Hi,

[#875] Re: call with a Proc — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 1999/10/28

Yukihiro Matsumoto writes:

[#880] Re: call with a Proc — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/10/29

Hi cle,

[#877] local / dynamic variables — ts <decoux@...>

11 messages 1999/10/29

[#889] Re: local / dynamic variables — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/10/30

Hi,

[#878] Re: local / dynamic variables — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/10/29

Hi,

[#885] Re: local / dynamic variables — ts <decoux@...> 1999/10/30

>>>>> "G" == GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp> writes:

[#886] Re: local / dynamic variables — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/10/30

Hi,

[#887] Re: local / dynamic variables — ts <decoux@...> 1999/10/30

>>>>> "G" == GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp> writes:

[#888] Re: local / dynamic variables — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/10/30

Hi,

[#879] local / dynamic variables — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/10/29

ts writes:

[#881] Re: local / dynamic variables — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/10/29

Hi,

[#890] Re: local / dynamic variables — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/10/30

GOTO Kentaro writes:

[#883] ANNOUNCE: rbison 0.0.5 — Jonathan Aseltine <aseltine@...> 1999/10/30

Clemens Hintze wrote:

[#882] www.ruby-lang.org — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Hi,

1 message 1999/10/29

[#884] ANNOUNCE: rbison 0.0.5 (#2) — Jonathan Aseltine <aseltine@...>

rbison takes a Bison generated parser and produces a Ruby parser class,

1 message 1999/10/30

[#891] vote reopen — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)

Hi,

1 message 1999/10/30

[ruby-talk:00876] Re: call with a Proc

From: Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...>

Date: 1999-10-28 16:00:39 UTC

List: ruby-talk #876

Hi gotoken,

GOTO Kentaro writes:
> In message "[ruby-talk:00869] Re: call with a Proc"
>     on 99/10/28, ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
> 

[...]

> 
> I think FTP#list should do type-check and display more suitable
> message if type error is detected. 

Nonononono! Please not!!!!!!

I realize more and more, that every type checking is a great potential
danger to corrupt or even destroy a clear OO design!!!

I am currently learning and using C++. Learning means here, upgrade my
knowledge from C++ 1.2 -> ANSI C++. The same time I am learning and
playing a little bit with Objective C. Although C++ is more mightier
than ObjC, but it let struggle me all the time, because of its damned
type checking.

With all the nice features of C++, I am currently solving problems, I
would not have with Ruby or ObjC..... :-(

So please don't propagate type checking too much. Gimme freedom! :-)
If I really want to put another object than a string into FTP#list,
please let me do it. If my object reacts properly, ok! If not, my
fault!!! :-))))

BTW: I don't think, the error message was not clear enough!!!

> 
> -- gotoken

\cle

Thread

In This Thread