[#863] RDtool-0.5.0 — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp>
Hi,
18 messages
1999/10/23
[#864] Re: RDtool-0.5.0
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/10/26
Hi,
[#865] Re: RDtool-0.5.0
— Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp>
1999/10/26
Hi,
[#866] Re: RDtool-0.5.0
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/10/26
Hi,
[#892] Re: RDtool-0.5.0
— Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp>
1999/10/31
Hi,
[#894] Re: RDtool-0.5.0
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/11/01
Hi,
[#905] Re: RDtool-0.5.0
— Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp>
1999/11/04
Hi,
[#906] Re: RDtool-0.5.0
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/11/04
Hi,
[#907] Re: RDtool-0.5.0
— Kazuhiro HIWADA <hiwada@...>
1999/11/04
Hi,
[#908] Re: RDtool-0.5.0
— kjana@... (YANAGAWA Kazuhisa)
1999/11/05
In message <19991105025532K.hiwada@kuee.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
[#867] call with a Proc — ts <decoux@...>
11 messages
1999/10/28
[#868] Re: call with a Proc
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/10/28
Hi,
[#877] local / dynamic variables — ts <decoux@...>
11 messages
1999/10/29
[#878] Re: local / dynamic variables
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/10/29
Hi,
[ruby-talk:00870] Re: call with a Proc
From:
gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
Date:
1999-10-28 06:32:54 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #870
In message "[ruby-talk:00869] Re: call with a Proc"
on 99/10/28, ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
>G> b.list(arg1, arg2, &Proc.new{ ... })
>
> OK, I've forgotten & before Proc
By the way, the error massage was not kind. It was difficult to
realize the absence of &.
I think FTP#list should do type-check and display more suitable
message if type error is detected.
-- gotoken