[#863] RDtool-0.5.0 — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp>
Hi,
18 messages
1999/10/23
[#864] Re: RDtool-0.5.0
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/10/26
Hi,
[#865] Re: RDtool-0.5.0
— Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp>
1999/10/26
Hi,
[#866] Re: RDtool-0.5.0
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/10/26
Hi,
[#892] Re: RDtool-0.5.0
— Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp>
1999/10/31
Hi,
[#894] Re: RDtool-0.5.0
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/11/01
Hi,
[#905] Re: RDtool-0.5.0
— Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp>
1999/11/04
Hi,
[#906] Re: RDtool-0.5.0
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/11/04
Hi,
[#907] Re: RDtool-0.5.0
— Kazuhiro HIWADA <hiwada@...>
1999/11/04
Hi,
[#908] Re: RDtool-0.5.0
— kjana@... (YANAGAWA Kazuhisa)
1999/11/05
In message <19991105025532K.hiwada@kuee.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
[#867] call with a Proc — ts <decoux@...>
11 messages
1999/10/28
[#868] Re: call with a Proc
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/10/28
Hi,
[#877] local / dynamic variables — ts <decoux@...>
11 messages
1999/10/29
[#878] Re: local / dynamic variables
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/10/29
Hi,
[ruby-talk:00845] Re: separator of RD block
From:
Minero Aoki <aamine@...>
Date:
1999-10-08 16:34:03 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #845
Hi,
In mail "[ruby-talk:00841] separator of RD block"
Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@gmx.net> wrote:
> If I have understand you right, your proposal should be already under
> discussion. See [ruby-talk:00695] and follow-ups. Is that what you
> mean? :-)))
Yes, my proposal is related to [ruby-talk:00695].
Changing is that "=begin RD ..." is also RD.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Minero Aoki