[#30872] segv when reentering into Fiber with callcc — sheepman <sheepman@...>

こんばんは、sheepman です。

15 messages 2007/06/01
[#30899] Re: segv when reentering into Fiber with callcc — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2007/06/06

 ささだです。

[#30905] Re: segv when reentering into Fiber with callcc — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...> 2007/06/06

遠藤と申します。

[#30906] Re: segv when reentering into Fiber with callcc — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2007/06/06

 ささだです。

[#30929] secrand.rb — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

51 messages 2007/06/08
[#30930] Re: secrand.rb — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2007/06/08

In article <4669066C.2080307@sarion.co.jp>,

[#30934] Re: secrand.rb — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2007/06/08

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#30935] Re: secrand.rb — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2007/06/08

In article <46694461.4060706@sarion.co.jp>,

[#30936] Re: secrand.rb — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2007/06/08

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#30938] Re: secrand.rb — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2007/06/08

In article <46697C0B.8060402@sarion.co.jp>,

[#30939] Re: secrand.rb — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2007/06/08

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#30940] Re: secrand.rb — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2007/06/08

In article <4669DAB0.4050705@sarion.co.jp>,

[#30944] Re: secrand.rb — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2007/06/09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#30945] Re: secrand.rb — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2007/06/09

In article <466AA73C.9030407@sarion.co.jp>,

[#30946] Re: secrand.rb — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2007/06/09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#30950] Re: secrand.rb — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/06/11

なかだです。

[#31173] Re: Random — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2007/07/10

In article <469253E9.9010203@sarion.co.jp>,

[#31174] Re: Random — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2007/07/10

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#31178] Re: Random — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2007/07/11

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#31179] Re: Random — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2007/07/11

In article <4694338C.7090303@sarion.co.jp>,

[#31183] Re: Random — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2007/07/11

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#30971] Linux/ia64で'ucontext_t' undeclared — akira yamada / やまだあきら <akira@...>

最近のRuby 1.9をLinux/ia64上でmakeしようとすると

16 messages 2007/06/13
[#30973] Re: Linux/ia64で'ucontext_t' undeclared — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/06/13

まつもと ゆきひろです

[#30974] Re: Linux/ia64で'ucontext_t' undeclared — akira@... 2007/06/13

Yukihiro Matsumoto さんは書きました:

[#30975] Re: Linux/ia64で'ucontext_t' undeclared — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/06/13

まつもと ゆきひろです

[ruby-dev:30859] Re: block wrapper

From: SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Date: 2007-06-01 00:59:23 UTC
List: ruby-dev #30859
 ささだです。

Yukihiro Matsumoto さんは書きました:
>   * yieldの方は、ブロックを呼び出すというニュアンスをより強く
>     表現できる
> 
>   * nil#yield(いつもエラーになる)を同時に定義するのでブロック
>     が与えられないの(ブロック引数がnil)の時のエラーが
> 
>       undefined method `call' for nil:NilClass
> 
>     よりマシになる。

 Proc#call と Proc#yield は、機能的にはまったく同じ、というこ
とで良いでしょうか。

 matzruby/eval.c:

    rb_define_method(rb_cProc, "call", rb_proc_call, -2);
    rb_define_method(rb_cProc, "yield", rb_proc_call, -2);

とあるので、いいのかな。

-- 
// SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net


In This Thread