From: daniel@...42.com Date: 2019-09-09T02:36:14+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:94853] [Ruby master Feature#16150] Add a way to request a frozen string from to_s Issue #16150 has been updated by Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme). > So, let's make Symbol#to_s frozen? > I think in general it makes a lot of sense that immutable classes return a frozen String for #to_s. That makes sense, and I agree that's the cleanest solution. There's really nothing in the contract that says `to_s` is supposed to return a non-frozen string. But I can't agree to a backward-incompatible change without a proper deprecation period. So I went and added Feature #16153 for a way to allow a phase-in period for frozen `Symbol#to_s`. ---------------------------------------- Feature #16150: Add a way to request a frozen string from to_s https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16150#change-81474 * Author: headius (Charles Nutter) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: ---------------------------------------- Much of the time when a user calls to_s, they are just looking for a simple string representation to display or to interpolate into another string. In my brief exploration, the result of to_s is rarely mutated directly. It seems that we could save a lot of objects by providing a way to explicitly request a *frozen* string. For purposes of discussion I will call this to_frozen_string, which is a terrible name. This would reduce string allocations dramatically when applied to many common to_s calls: * Symbol#to_frozen_string could always return the same cached String representation. This method is *heavily* used by almost all Ruby code that intermingles Symbols and Strings. * nil, true, false, and any other singleton values in the system could similarly cache and return the same String object. * The strings coming from core types could also be in the fstring cache and deduplicated as a result. * User-provided to_s implementations could opt-in to caching and returning the same frozen String object when the author knows that the result will always be the same. A few ideas for what to call this: * `to_fstring` or `fstring` reflects internal the "fstring" cache but is perhaps not obvious for most users. * `to_s(frozen: true)` is clean but there will be many cases when the kwargs hash doesn't get eliminated, making matters worse. * `def to_s(frozen = false)` would be mostly free but may not be compatible with existing to_s params (like `Integer#to_s(radix)` This idea was inspired by @schneems's talk at RubyConf Thailand, where he showed significant overhead in ActiveRecord from Symbol#to_s allocation. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: