From: merch-redmine@... Date: 2019-09-09T19:36:53+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:94872] [Ruby master Misc#16157] What is the correct and *portable* way to do generic delegation? Issue #16157 has been updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans). Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme) wrote: > I've compiled your delegate-keyword-argument-separation branch to test this. BTW in your example it should be `respond_to?(:pass_positional_hash, true)` > > The portability result is... Almost there, but not quite. In 2.6 and 2.7, `o.empty?` cannot distinguish between `foo()` and `foo({})`. This results in the discrepancies found below via this test script. Thank you for working on this and providing the detailed example. I think your analysis is correct. We could handle this in 2.7 by introducing a method to check for whether positional->keyword hash conversion was done, but as we cannot change the behavior in 2.0-2.6, it looks like we cannot use the same method definition to delegate to all possible target method definitions with all possible arguments and be backwards compatible with <2.7. For best compatibility, you will need separate method definitions for <2.7 and 2.7+: ```ruby class Proxy < BasicObject def initialize(target) @target = target end if ::RUBY_VERSION < '2.7' def method_missing(*a, &b) @target.send(*a, &b) rescue $! end else def method_missing(*a, **o, &b) @target.send(*a, **o, &b) rescue $! end pass_positional_hash(:method_missing) if respond_to?(:pass_positional_hash, true) end end class Test def args(*a) a end def arg(a) a end def opts(**o) o end def arg0o(a=nil, **o) [a,o] end def arg1o(a, **o) [a,o] end end e = Object.new def e.write(*args) $stdout.print("warn! ") end $stderr = e opt = {} hash = {k:42} proxy = Proxy.new(Test.new) p proxy.args(42) p proxy.arg(42) p proxy.arg({k:42}) p proxy.arg({}) p proxy.opts(k: 42) p proxy.arg0o(hash) p proxy.arg0o(hash, **{}) p proxy.arg0o(hash, **opt) ``` This results in the following behavior for 2.6.4 and 2.7.0 with the delegate-keyword-argument-separation branch: ``` ruby 2.6.4p104 ��� ruby 2.7.0-delegate-keyword-argument-separation [42] ��� [42] 42 ��� 42 {:k=>42} ��� {:k=>42} {} ��� {} {:k=>42} ��� {:k=>42} [nil, {:k=>42}] ��� warn! warn! [nil, {:k=>42}] [nil, {:k=>42}] ��� [{:k=>42}, {}] [{:k=>42}, {}] ��� [{:k=>42}, {}] ``` The only behavior difference is for `**{}`, which was ignored by the parser in 2.6, and is not likely to appear in production code. The only warning in 2.7 is for `proxy.arg0o(hash)`, which correctly warns in 2.7 as the behavior will change in 3.0 to be the same as `proxy.arg0o(hash, **opt)` in 2.6. Note that could use metaprogramming to reduce the duplication: ```ruby class Proxy < BasicObject def initialize(target) @target = target end kw = ", **kw" if ::RUBY_VERSION >= '2.7' class_eval(<<-END, __FILE__, __LINE__+1) def method_missing(*a#{kw}, &b) @target.send(*a#{kw}, &b) rescue $! end END pass_positional_hash(:method_missing) if respond_to?(:pass_positional_hash, true) end ``` ---------------------------------------- Misc #16157: What is the correct and *portable* way to do generic delegation? https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16157#change-81488 * Author: Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: ---------------------------------------- With the keyword argument changes in 2.7 we must now specify keyword arguments explicitly when doing generic delegation. But this change is not compatible with 2.6, where it adds an empty hash to the argument list of methods that do not need/accept keyword arguments. To illustrate the problem: ```ruby class ProxyWithoutKW < BasicObject def initialize(target) @target = target end def method_missing(*a, &b) @target.send(*a, &b) end end class ProxyWithKW < BasicObject def initialize(target) @target = target end def method_missing(*a, **o, &b) @target.send(*a, **o, &b) end end class Test def args(*a) a end def arg(a) a end def opts(**o) o end end # 2.6 2.7 3.0 ProxyWithoutKW.new(Test.new).args(42) # [42] [42] [42] ok ProxyWithoutKW.new(Test.new).arg(42) # 42 42 42 ok ProxyWithoutKW.new(Test.new).opts(k: 42) # {:k=>42} {:k=>42} +warn [{:k=>42}] incompatible with >= 2.7 ProxyWithKW.new(Test.new).args(42) # [42, {}] [42] [42] incompatible with <= 2.6 ProxyWithKW.new(Test.new).arg(42) # error 42 42 incompatible with <= 2.6 ProxyWithKW.new(Test.new).opts(k: 42) # {:k=>42} {:k=>42} +warn {:k=>42} must ignore warning? cannot use pass_positional_hash in 2.6 ``` I don't know how to solve this, so I'm asking for the **official** correct way to write portable delegation code. And by **portable** I mean code that can be used in gems that target ruby 2.6 and above. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: