[#82706] [Ruby trunk Bug#13851] getting "can't modify string; temporarily locked" on non-frozen instances — cardoso_tiago@...
Issue #13851 has been updated by chucke (Tiago Cardoso).
3 messages
2017/09/07
[#82853] [Ruby trunk Bug#13916] Race condition when sending a signal to a new fork — russell.davis@...
Issue #13916 has been reported by russelldavis (Russell Davis).
3 messages
2017/09/19
[#82892] [Ruby trunk Bug#13921] buffered read_nonblock doesn't work as expected using SSLSocket — cardoso_tiago@...
Issue #13921 has been updated by chucke (Tiago Cardoso).
3 messages
2017/09/20
[ruby-core:82684] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#13875] segfault in Enumerable#zip after GC
From:
Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Date:
2017-09-06 22:57:23 UTC
List:
ruby-core #82684
xkernigh@netscape.net wrote: > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13875#change-66516 <snip> > But this trick might not be the correct fix. I fear a problem > with fibers, because there is a fiber switch when zip_i() > calls Enumerator#next. Perhaps the GC can't find tmp while the > other fiber is running. Is FIBER_USE_NATIVE enabled in cont.c? Does the problem go away if you flip that? Also, which compiler + non-standard CFLAGS do you use? We don't have a lot of OpenBSD users here; +cc Jeremy... Does this affect older versions of Ruby, too? We've had some recent movement in cont.c in trunk and maybe broke something in Fiber stack marking... I'm also curious which RB_GC_GUARD implementation you use (it's compiler-dependent). The rb_gc_guarded_ptr_val one in include/ruby/ruby.h should be strongest since it can't be inlined (but slowest). Perhaps try that one if you're not using it... Thanks. Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>