[#82706] [Ruby trunk Bug#13851] getting "can't modify string; temporarily locked" on non-frozen instances — cardoso_tiago@...
Issue #13851 has been updated by chucke (Tiago Cardoso).
3 messages
2017/09/07
[#82853] [Ruby trunk Bug#13916] Race condition when sending a signal to a new fork — russell.davis@...
Issue #13916 has been reported by russelldavis (Russell Davis).
3 messages
2017/09/19
[#82892] [Ruby trunk Bug#13921] buffered read_nonblock doesn't work as expected using SSLSocket — cardoso_tiago@...
Issue #13921 has been updated by chucke (Tiago Cardoso).
3 messages
2017/09/20
[ruby-core:82635] [Ruby trunk Feature#13667][Feedback] Add Coverage.running? to quickly check if Coverage is enabled.
From:
mame@...
Date:
2017-09-02 14:11:54 UTC
List:
ruby-core #82635
Issue #13667 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh).
Status changed from Closed to Feedback
I applied the patch proposed. After that, however, I'm now considering reverting it.
I noticed that this feature may be dangerous. By using this, we can easily write a program that changes its behavior only under coverage measurement. It brings difficulties to testing with coverage measurement. I don't see such a bad program released into the wild.
Could you elaborate your use case that beats the disadvantage? If any, I will remain the feature, but otherwise, I will revert it.
----------------------------------------
Feature #13667: Add Coverage.running? to quickly check if Coverage is enabled.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13667#change-66462
* Author: burke (Burke Libbey)
* Status: Feedback
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: mame (Yusuke Endoh)
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
Since we can't `RubyVM::InstructionSequence#to_binary` when `Coverage` is running, it is useful to be able to ask ruby if coverage is active.
This is possible with `Coverage.peek_result`, but not efficient, since it involves quite a bit of data copying.
I've used the private symbol `rb_get_coverages` in [bootsnap](https://github.com/Shopify/bootsnap/pull/63) for now but this feels worth exposing publicly.
```
> Benchmark.realtime { 100.times{ Coverage.peek_result } }
=> 1.3659249999909662
> Benchmark.realtime { 100.times{ Bootsnap::CompileCache::Native.coverage_running? } }
=> 5.099998088553548e-05
```
Example usage:
```
class RubyVM::InstructionSequence
def load_iseq(path)
return nil if defined?(Coverage) && Coverage.running?
# ...
end
end
```
---Files--------------------------------
0001-Add-Coverage.enabled-to-quickly-check-if-coverage-is.patch (1.97 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>