[#82706] [Ruby trunk Bug#13851] getting "can't modify string; temporarily locked" on non-frozen instances — cardoso_tiago@...
Issue #13851 has been updated by chucke (Tiago Cardoso).
3 messages
2017/09/07
[#82853] [Ruby trunk Bug#13916] Race condition when sending a signal to a new fork — russell.davis@...
Issue #13916 has been reported by russelldavis (Russell Davis).
3 messages
2017/09/19
[#82892] [Ruby trunk Bug#13921] buffered read_nonblock doesn't work as expected using SSLSocket — cardoso_tiago@...
Issue #13921 has been updated by chucke (Tiago Cardoso).
3 messages
2017/09/20
[ruby-core:82621] [Ruby trunk Bug#13857] frozen string literal: can freeze same string into two unique frozen strings
From:
cardoso_tiago@...
Date:
2017-09-01 10:54:22 UTC
List:
ruby-core #82621
Issue #13857 has been updated by chucke (Tiago Cardoso). Please don't get me wrong, I'm not arguing that the spec for the feature is vague. I understood that the introduction of the feature was to reduce memory consumption in template generation (like erb templates), and to avoid those `CONTENT_LENGTH = "Content-Length".freeze` assignments seen a bit everywhere from ruby web servers to rack. In most of these libs (here's [rack's example](https://github.com/rack/rack/blob/911c4fe15e3e57d44ac891c0cbabbf44bdf71201/lib/rack/utils.rb#L445)), there's an header hash abstraction which applies downcase operation to the keys, and then (optionally) freezes. Point being, at any given time, we might have two strings in memory (ex: `"Content-Length"`), both frozen, one of them a literal. ---------------------------------------- Bug #13857: frozen string literal: can freeze same string into two unique frozen strings https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13857#change-66447 * Author: chucke (Tiago Cardoso) * Status: Rejected * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: * ruby -v: 2.3.4, 2.4.1 * Backport: 2.2: UNKNOWN, 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Running an interpreter with `--enable-frozen-string-literal` on, I get the following: ```ruby > "bang".object_id #=> 70303434940940 GOOD! > "bang".object_id #=> 70303434940940 GOOD! > "bang".object_id #=> 70303434940940 GOOD! > c = "bang" > c.object_id #=> 70303434940940 GOOD! > c.downcase #=> "bang" > c.downcase.object_id #=> 70303430619560 SO SO! > c.downcase.freeze.object_id #=> 70303430601780 BAD! ``` This ticket concerns the last two examples. In the case of performing an operation on the string, it makes sense to return a new string, even if the result is the same. However, I think that the last one could be done differently, in that the frozen result of the downcased value should be the original literal. I didn't see yet how the frozen string literals are implemented, so this might be dependent on it, but I think that this misses a few optimization use cases. One notable example is keeping a headers hash from an http library. `net/http` keeps a version of the headers hash with the keys downcased, only to capitalize them on send. Something like this: ```ruby request["Content-Type"] = "text/html" #=> key stored in request will be "content-type" ``` will create more allocations than expected. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>