[#71439] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API — matz@...
Issue #11339 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
7 messages
2015/11/11
[#71473] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/11/13
Entire series for sockets
[#71450] Ruby 2.3.0-preview1 Released — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2015/11/11
[#71617] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11664] [PATCH] introduce rb_autoload_value to replace rb_autoload — nobu@...
Issue #11664 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
3 messages
2015/11/20
[#71721] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11741] Migrate Ruby to Git from Subversion — me@...
Issue #11741 has been updated by Jon Moss.
4 messages
2015/11/28
[ruby-core:71764] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11754] Visibility scope is kept after lexical scope is closed
From:
jeanphilippe.doyle@...
Date:
2015-11-30 21:13:21 UTC
List:
ruby-core #71764
Issue #11754 has been updated by Jean-Philippe Doyle. ruby -v set to ruby 2.3.0preview1 (2015-11-11 trunk 52539) [x86_64-darwin13] To provide some context, this creates issues with two gems I am using that have dynamically defined methods (that now seems to be incorrectly private in 2.3.0preview1) : - paranoia (`really_destroy!` method defined in https://github.com/rubysherpas/paranoia/blob/rails4/lib/paranoia.rb#L185-L190) - money (all methods defined in https://github.com/RubyMoney/money/blob/master/lib/money/money/formatting.rb#L4-L14) ---------------------------------------- Bug #11754: Visibility scope is kept after lexical scope is closed https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11754#change-55173 * Author: Max Melentiev * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * ruby -v: ruby 2.3.0preview1 (2015-11-11 trunk 52539) [x86_64-darwin13] * Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- ~~~ module X def self.test_def def x; end; end private def y; end; end X.test_def X.instance_methods ~~~ In 2.2 it returns [:x], in 2.3-preview1 it returns empty array. Is it ok? -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/