[#71439] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API — matz@...
Issue #11339 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
7 messages
2015/11/11
[#71473] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/11/13
Entire series for sockets
[#71450] Ruby 2.3.0-preview1 Released — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2015/11/11
[#71617] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11664] [PATCH] introduce rb_autoload_value to replace rb_autoload — nobu@...
Issue #11664 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
3 messages
2015/11/20
[#71721] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11741] Migrate Ruby to Git from Subversion — me@...
Issue #11741 has been updated by Jon Moss.
4 messages
2015/11/28
[ruby-core:71534] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10984] Hash#contain? to check whether hash contains other hash
From:
hi@...
Date:
2015-11-17 23:54:29 UTC
List:
ruby-core #71534
Issue #10984 has been updated by Olivier Lacan.
Ilya Vorontsov wrote:
> So why one can sort this array and which result does one expect?:
>
> ```ruby
> [{}, {a:1,b:2}, {c:3}, {a:1}, {b:2}].sort
> ```
This is the actual result with 2.3.0-preview1:
```ruby
RUBY_VERSION
=> "2.3.0"
[{}, {a:1,b:2}, {c:3}, {a:1}, {b:2}].sort
ArgumentError: comparison of Hash with Hash failed
```
Maybe I'm reading you too quickly or I'm too tired but did you note that `<=>` is **not** implemented on Hash? Matz made that clear and Akira Tanaka clarified it in [this response](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10984#note-11).
----------------------------------------
Feature #10984: Hash#contain? to check whether hash contains other hash
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10984#change-54913
* Author: Olivier Lacan
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Akira Tanaka
----------------------------------------
Comparing hashes seems like a common practice but there currently isn't a method to ask a
hash instance whether it includes another hash instance.
The most intuitive method to reach for would be `Hash#include?` but it is in fact an alias to `Hash#has_key?`
What I'm looking for can be achieved with:
~~~
class Hash
def contain?(other)
self.merge(other) == self
end
end
~~~
Here's a simple demo of `#contain?` in use:
~~~
{ a: true, b: false }.contain?({ a: true})
# => true
{ a: true, b: false }.contain?({ b: false})
# => true
{ a: true, b: false }.contain?({ a: false})
# => false
{ a: true, b: false }.contain?({ c: true})
# => false
~~~
One important note is that this method is *not checking for nested hash matches*.
This may need to be addressed when the parameters include a nested hash perhaps.
Thanks to Terence Lee's help, nobu created a patch for this feature last year.
I've only modified the name of the method from [his original patch](https://gist.github.com/nobu/dfe8ba14a48fc949f2ed) and attached it to this issue.
---Files--------------------------------
Hash#contain_.patch (2.22 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/