[#71439] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API — matz@...
Issue #11339 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
7 messages
2015/11/11
[#71473] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/11/13
Entire series for sockets
[#71450] Ruby 2.3.0-preview1 Released — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2015/11/11
[#71617] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11664] [PATCH] introduce rb_autoload_value to replace rb_autoload — nobu@...
Issue #11664 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
3 messages
2015/11/20
[#71721] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11741] Migrate Ruby to Git from Subversion — me@...
Issue #11741 has been updated by Jon Moss.
4 messages
2015/11/28
[ruby-core:71738] behavior of Array#dig when passed a non-numeric index?
From:
Colin Kelley <colindkelley@...>
Date:
2015-11-29 23:24:33 UTC
List:
ruby-core #71738
Hello,
I am working on this gem to provide backward-compatibility of the new `dig`
method in `Hash` and `Array`.
https://rubygems.org/gems/ruby_dig
(See the accompanying blog post for more info.
http://development.invoca.com/ruby_dig-gem-adds-hash-dig-and-array-dig-from-ruby-2-3-to-earlier-versions/
)
But I can't tell from the documentation or tests in the original commit
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/29862685c0acf3a40c6b1f9e8780cbbd86cba658
what is supposed to happen if Array#dig is passed a non-numeric index. For
example:
['zero', 'one', 'two'].dig(:first)
It seems like the C code is just calling the `[]` operator, in which case
it would raise this exception:
TypeError: no implicit conversion of Symbol into Integer
But it definitely seems like the spirit of `dig` that `nil` should be
returned if the expected structure isn't there. I believe the most typical
use case for `dig` is to dig through a JSON hash and either find the result
we expected, or get `nil`. Wouldn't it defeat the purpose of `dig` if we
had to wrap it in a `rescue`?
Can we clarify the desired behavior, then update the documentation and
tests to reflect that?
-Colin