From: 6ftdan@... Date: 2015-11-18T18:41:10+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:71562] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11690] Update Hash during multiple assignment Issue #11690 has been updated by Daniel P. Clark. I was thinking of what word(s) may best clarify this and not conflict with other potential uses. One issue about the word `assigned` is it seems like `self = ` or `replace`. I at first was thinking of `to_be` ... but that's sounds more like a promise of the future and each method would have to end in `ed` like so `x.to_be.updated = a: 1`. To avoid using a promise form and complex `ed` handling I was thinking of just `to`; `x.to.update`. But I don't think this is clear enough. So I have found the shortest thing I can think of that matches the statement `to_be_assigned_with`, and that is `apply`. It's short, simple, clear, and reveals to anyone that more is being done here. To copy from Nobuyoshi's idea ~~~Ruby class Applicable def initialize(obj) @target = obj end def method_missing(m, *args) @target.__send__(m.to_s.chomp('='), *args) end def respond_to_missing?(m) @target.respond_to?(m.to_s.chomp('=')) end end module Kernel def apply Applicable.new(self) end end x = {a: 1, b: 2} x.apply.update, y ,z = {c: 3}, 6, 7 p x ~~~ Arguably I think this is just as clear as `to_be_assigned_with`, and is different enough for people to notice that something else is going on here. That should be enough. ---------------------------------------- Feature #11690: Update Hash during multiple assignment https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11690#change-54944 * Author: Daniel P. Clark * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: ---------------------------------------- Given that we can assign multiple variables at once ~~~ruby a,b,c = 1,2,3 ~~~ It would be nice to be able to update a Hash during multiple assignment rather than replacing it. Currently ~~~ruby x = {a: 1, b: 2} x, y ,z = {c: 3}, 6, 7 x # => {c: 3} ~~~ What I propose is adding `Hash#update=` to permit updating during multiple assignment. ~~~ruby class Hash def update=(h) update(h) end end x = {a: 1, b: 2} x.update, y ,z = {c: 3}, 6, 7 x # => {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3} ~~~ This would be most useful in scenarios where a method or proc return multiple values. When the method returns the values we don't normally know the key outside where the hash assignment is. ~~~ruby example = proc { [{:hi => :hello}, 5] } hash = {} # Currently in Ruby with an Unknown key multiple assignment isn't an option hash[????], current = example.call # We currently have to two step it result, current = example.call hash.update(result) ~~~ But with `Hash#update=` we don't have to know the key. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/