From: 6ftdan@... Date: 2015-11-18T19:13:21+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:71563] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11690] Update Hash during multiple assignment Issue #11690 has been updated by Daniel P. Clark. If we wanted to avoid chomping the equals sign on methods that have the equals already we'd have to write in a check for that. But I'm not sure that would be as performant. ~~~ruby class Applicable def initialize(obj) @target = obj end def method_missing(m, *args) m = @target.respond_to?(m) ? m : m.to_s.chomp('=') @target.__send__(m, *args) end def respond_to_missing?(m) @target.respond_to?(m.to_s.chomp('=')) end end x = {a: 1, b: 2} x.apply.update, y ,z = {c: 3}, 6, 7 # Hash still responds to :[]= method now after :apply x.apply[:z] = 0 x # => {:a=>1, :b=>2, :c=>3, :z=>0} ~~~ ---------------------------------------- Feature #11690: Update Hash during multiple assignment https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11690#change-54945 * Author: Daniel P. Clark * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: ---------------------------------------- Given that we can assign multiple variables at once ~~~ruby a,b,c = 1,2,3 ~~~ It would be nice to be able to update a Hash during multiple assignment rather than replacing it. Currently ~~~ruby x = {a: 1, b: 2} x, y ,z = {c: 3}, 6, 7 x # => {c: 3} ~~~ What I propose is adding `Hash#update=` to permit updating during multiple assignment. ~~~ruby class Hash def update=(h) update(h) end end x = {a: 1, b: 2} x.update, y ,z = {c: 3}, 6, 7 x # => {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3} ~~~ This would be most useful in scenarios where a method or proc return multiple values. When the method returns the values we don't normally know the key outside where the hash assignment is. ~~~ruby example = proc { [{:hi => :hello}, 5] } hash = {} # Currently in Ruby with an Unknown key multiple assignment isn't an option hash[????], current = example.call # We currently have to two step it result, current = example.call hash.update(result) ~~~ But with `Hash#update=` we don't have to know the key. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/