[#71439] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API — matz@...
Issue #11339 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
7 messages
2015/11/11
[#71473] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/11/13
Entire series for sockets
[#71450] Ruby 2.3.0-preview1 Released — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2015/11/11
[#71617] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11664] [PATCH] introduce rb_autoload_value to replace rb_autoload — nobu@...
Issue #11664 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
3 messages
2015/11/20
[#71721] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11741] Migrate Ruby to Git from Subversion — me@...
Issue #11741 has been updated by Jon Moss.
4 messages
2015/11/28
[ruby-core:71502] Re: [ruby-cvs:58952] hsbt:r51801 (trunk): * lib/rubygems: Update to RubyGems HEAD(fe61e4c112).
From:
SHIBATA Hiroshi <hsbt@...>
Date:
2015-11-16 07:57:23 UTC
List:
ruby-core #71502
Hi Eric. Sorry, too late response. I reported your issue to https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/1385 I hope to solve this issue before 2.3.0-rc1 release day. On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:46 AM, Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote: > hsbt@ruby-lang.org wrote: >> * lib/rubygems: Update to RubyGems HEAD(fe61e4c112). >> this version contains new feature that warn invalid SPDX license > > RubyGems does not accept '+' suffix as allowed by > http://spdx.org/licenses for "or later" clause. > > With "GPL-2.0+", I get: > > WARNING: WARNING: license value 'GPL-2.0+' is invalid. Use a license > identifier from > http://spdx.org/licenses or 'Nonstandard' for a nonstandard license. > > I'm not touching a proprietary bug report interface, > so forwarding this to upstream would be appreciated. > Thanks. > > Side note: > > I also have software under the old Ruby (<= 1.9.2) > license (with GPL option) which matches the text in > > http://spdx.org/licenses/Ruby.html#licenseText > > But the link on that spdx.org page also points to > http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/LICENSE.txt and that is > points to the new BSD-2-Clause (which I cannot > relicense my project to). So I'm a little nervous > about declaring "Ruby" as a license option in the > gemspec nowadays. -- SHIBATA Hiroshi hsbt@ruby-lang.org http://www.hsbt.org/