[#65451] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10333] [PATCH 3/1] optimize: "yoda literal" == string — ko1@...
Issue #10333 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
ko1@atdot.net wrote:
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
On 2014/10/09 11:04, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#65453] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10328] [PATCH] make OPT_SUPPORT_JOKE a proper VM option — ko1@...
Issue #10328 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
[#65559] is there a name for this? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
When describing stuff about constants (working in their guide), you often
On 2014/10/09 20:41, Xavier Noria wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#65566] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10351] [Open] [PATCH] prevent CVE-2014-6277 — shyouhei@...
Issue #10351 has been reported by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#65741] Re: [ruby-cvs:55121] normal:r47971 (trunk): test/ruby/test_rubyoptions.rb: fix race — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On 2014/10/16 10:10, normal@ruby-lang.org wrote:
Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
2014-10-16 12:48 GMT+09:00 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
[#65753] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10333] [PATCH 3/1] optimize: "yoda literal" == string — ko1@...
Issue #10333 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
[#65818] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10351] [PATCH] prevent CVE-2014-6277 — shyouhei@...
Issue #10351 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[ruby-core:65361] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10314] Default argument lookup fails in Ruby 2.2 for circular shadowed variable names
Issue #10314 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
Loren Segal wrote:
> 1. This seems like a breaking change in Ruby 2.2.0-preview1 that was not announced in the changelog. My guess is this change may have been unintentional, but if it was we need a changelog entry at the very least.
I agree. How about to show a warning?
> 2. If this is newly expected behavior, I wanted to chime in that I don't think it makes much sense. I can't think of any time when a user would expect the default value of a "foo = foo" argument to be the same foo argument itself. That would be tautologically nil. Arguably, it doesn't make much sense inside of a method body either when there is a shadowed method that could be called instead.
I think this change is to make same as method body ("foo = foo" in method body).
I'm not sure it is natural or not (matz issue?).
I like current behavior because it is simple (define a local variable `foo' after the sentence `foo=').
----------------------------------------
Bug #10314: Default argument lookup fails in Ruby 2.2 for circular shadowed variable names
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10314#change-49167
* Author: Loren Segal
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Category: core
* Target version: current: 2.2.0
* ruby -v: 2.2.0-preview1
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
The following code prints `nil` in Ruby 2.2.0-preview1 but worked in all previous version of Ruby back to 1.8.7:
~~~
class Foo
def foo; "abc" end
# this default param should resolve at runtime to the #foo method call
def run(foo = foo)
p foo # print shadowed local var defaulting to attr value
end
end
puts "Testing #{RUBY_VERSION}:"
Foo.new.run
# Ruby 2.2.0-preview1
# => nil
# Ruby 1.x 2.x etc
# => "abc"
~~~
My guess is this is happening because "foo" in "foo = foo" is resolving to the argument variable "foo", which currently has the value of nil. It would be equivalent to setting "qux = qux" in a method body, which has been the expected behavior for a long time.
I understand that shadowing variables is something you should probably never do, but unfortunately this code was already written and working for quite a while, so I figured it would be wise to file a bug report for the following reasons:
1. This seems like a breaking change in Ruby 2.2.0-preview1 that was not announced in the changelog. My guess is this change may have been unintentional, but if it was we need a changelog entry at the very least.
2. If this is newly expected behavior, I wanted to chime in that I don't think it makes much sense. I can't think of any time when a user would expect the default value of a "foo = foo" argument to be the same foo argument itself. That would be tautologically nil. Arguably, it doesn't make much sense inside of a method body either when there is a shadowed method that could be called instead.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/