[#65451] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10333] [PATCH 3/1] optimize: "yoda literal" == string — ko1@...
Issue #10333 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
ko1@atdot.net wrote:
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
On 2014/10/09 11:04, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#65453] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10328] [PATCH] make OPT_SUPPORT_JOKE a proper VM option — ko1@...
Issue #10328 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
[#65559] is there a name for this? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
When describing stuff about constants (working in their guide), you often
On 2014/10/09 20:41, Xavier Noria wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#65566] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10351] [Open] [PATCH] prevent CVE-2014-6277 — shyouhei@...
Issue #10351 has been reported by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#65741] Re: [ruby-cvs:55121] normal:r47971 (trunk): test/ruby/test_rubyoptions.rb: fix race — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On 2014/10/16 10:10, normal@ruby-lang.org wrote:
Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
2014-10-16 12:48 GMT+09:00 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
[#65753] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10333] [PATCH 3/1] optimize: "yoda literal" == string — ko1@...
Issue #10333 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
[#65818] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10351] [PATCH] prevent CVE-2014-6277 — shyouhei@...
Issue #10351 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[ruby-core:65796] [Backport21 - Backport #9640] Please backport SSL fixes to 2.1
Issue #9640 has been updated by Tomoyuki Chikanaga. >> I think users can protect themselves via configuration or update OpenSSL itself, not the by ruby C extension library. Is it correct? > ext/openssl(/lib/openssl/ssl.rb) actually sets the default of chiphers, so changing them of OpenSSL itself is meaningless about us. > Am I wrong? Thank you for pointing out that. It seems that I misunderstood about the point. So I think we *should* backport the change. > Since net/http does not have the interface to change the ciphers at the moment, available workaround should be a complex monkey patch, I guess. Yes. But I think the workaround to do something potentially dangerous could be complicated. Users should know what they really to do. ---------------------------------------- Backport #9640: Please backport SSL fixes to 2.1 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9640#change-49538 * Author: Christian Hofstaedtler * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: ---------------------------------------- Please backport the fixes for issue #9424 to 2.1. https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-trunk/repository/revisions/45274/diff/ext/openssl/lib/openssl/ssl.rb -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/