[#65451] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10333] [PATCH 3/1] optimize: "yoda literal" == string — ko1@...
Issue #10333 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
ko1@atdot.net wrote:
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
On 2014/10/09 11:04, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#65453] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10328] [PATCH] make OPT_SUPPORT_JOKE a proper VM option — ko1@...
Issue #10328 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
[#65559] is there a name for this? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
When describing stuff about constants (working in their guide), you often
On 2014/10/09 20:41, Xavier Noria wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#65566] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10351] [Open] [PATCH] prevent CVE-2014-6277 — shyouhei@...
Issue #10351 has been reported by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#65741] Re: [ruby-cvs:55121] normal:r47971 (trunk): test/ruby/test_rubyoptions.rb: fix race — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On 2014/10/16 10:10, normal@ruby-lang.org wrote:
Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
2014-10-16 12:48 GMT+09:00 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
[#65753] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10333] [PATCH 3/1] optimize: "yoda literal" == string — ko1@...
Issue #10333 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
[#65818] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10351] [PATCH] prevent CVE-2014-6277 — shyouhei@...
Issue #10351 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[ruby-core:65417] Re: [ruby-trunk - misc #10278] [RFC] st.c: use ccan linked list
Since we'll need it for st_reverse_foreach_check ([ruby-core:65408]), I've implemented list_for_each_rev_safe to ccan/list: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/ccan/2014-October/thread.html It applies on top of two of my others intended for compile.c: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/ccan/2014-September/thread.html Also, updated bench results from the weird FX-8320 CPU after simplifying the foreach loops a little: http://80x24.org/spew/m/st-ll-v2-results%40whir.txt (good, I think) Also http://80x24.org/spew/m/st-ccan-ll-fixup-1%4080x24.org.txt was wrong and I rejected it due to improved tests in [Feature #10321]