[#65451] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10333] [PATCH 3/1] optimize: "yoda literal" == string — ko1@...
Issue #10333 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
ko1@atdot.net wrote:
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
On 2014/10/09 11:04, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#65453] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10328] [PATCH] make OPT_SUPPORT_JOKE a proper VM option — ko1@...
Issue #10328 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
[#65559] is there a name for this? — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
When describing stuff about constants (working in their guide), you often
On 2014/10/09 20:41, Xavier Noria wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#65566] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10351] [Open] [PATCH] prevent CVE-2014-6277 — shyouhei@...
Issue #10351 has been reported by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#65741] Re: [ruby-cvs:55121] normal:r47971 (trunk): test/ruby/test_rubyoptions.rb: fix race — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On 2014/10/16 10:10, normal@ruby-lang.org wrote:
Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
2014-10-16 12:48 GMT+09:00 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
[#65753] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10333] [PATCH 3/1] optimize: "yoda literal" == string — ko1@...
Issue #10333 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
[#65818] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10351] [PATCH] prevent CVE-2014-6277 — shyouhei@...
Issue #10351 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[ruby-core:65449] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #10326] [Open] [PATCH] optimize: recv << "literal string"
normalperson@yhbt.net wrote:
> Future optimizations:
>
> * recv << "interpolated #{dstr}"
> (immediate free + force recycle)
Tried, not worth it from what I can tell:
http://80x24.org/spew/m/7c7dd29f45920fb8fc9d2c72858334c60e0a9c58.txt
(however, a good learning experience for me)
> * elide allocation for equality comparisons:
> str == "literal" and "literal" == str
See [Feature #10329] and [Feature #10333]
> * optimize << recv is IO << (str|dstr) (maybe)
I doubt it's worth the effort because of syscall overhead. This
(#10326) is fairly minor compared to the "==" optimizations in #10329
and #10333