[#44036] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6242][Open] Ruby should support lists — "shugo (Shugo Maeda)" <redmine@...>
[#44084] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6246][Open] 1.9.3-p125 intermittent segfault — "jshow (Jodi Showers)" <jodi@...>
[#44156] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6265][Open] Remove 'useless' 'concatenation' syntax — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
Hi,
(2012/04/09 14:19), Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#44163] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6266][Open] encoding related exception with recent integrated psych — "jonforums (Jon Forums)" <redmine@...>
[#44233] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6274][Open] Float addition incorrect — "swanboy (Michael Swan)" <swanyboy4@...>
[#44303] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6284][Open] Add composition for procs — "pabloh (Pablo Herrero)" <pablodherrero@...>
[#44329] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6287][Open] nested method should only be visible by nesting/enclosing method — "botp (bot pena)" <botpena@...>
[#44349] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6293][Open] new queue / blocking queues — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:58:12AM +0900, mame (Yusuke Endoh) wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 06:25:59PM +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#44372] Possible merge error of code in Issue 4651 on to Ruby 1.9.3-p125? — "Blythe,Aaron" <ABLYTHE@...>
tl;dr I believe I have uncovered a merge error to ruby 1.9.3-p125 from Issue 4651. Please advise if this is the same issue, or if a separate issue needs to be logged. Details below.
[#44431] [Backport93 - Backport #6314][Open] Backport r35374 and r35375 — "drbrain (Eric Hodel)" <drbrain@...7.net>
[#44432] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6315][Open] handler to trace output of each line of code executed — "ankopainting (Anko Painting)" <anko.com+ruby@...>
[#44533] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6341][Open] SIGSEGV: Thread.new { fork { GC.start } }.join — "rudolf (r stu3)" <redmine@...>
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:
Hello,
(4/24/12 6:55 AM), Yusuke Endoh wrote:
> kosaki (Motohiro KOSAKI) wrote:
[#44540] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6343][Open] Improved Fiber documentation — "andhapp (Anuj Dutta)" <anuj@...>
[#44612] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6354][Open] Remove escape (break/return/redo/next support) from class/module scope — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
[#44630] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6361][Open] Bitwise string operations — "MartinBosslet (Martin Bosslet)" <Martin.Bosslet@...>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:53 PM, MartinBosslet (Martin Bosslet)
On Saturday, April 28, 2012 at 8:52 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
[#44636] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6364][Open] Segmentation fault happend when running test_cptr.rb — "raylinn@... (ray linn)" <raylinn@...>
[#44667] possible YAML bug in ruby 1.9.3p125? — Young Hyun <youngh@...>
YAML in ruby 1.9.3p125 seems to have a bug reading in YAML from older Ruby versions. Specifically, YAML in 1.9.3p125 mis-parses text like "123_456" as a number (just as in Ruby) rather than as a string, which appears to be the correct behavior according to the YAML specification.
[#44686] [BUG] not a node 0x07 — ronald braswell <rpbraswell@...>
Running ruby 1.8.6 on Solaris 10.
2012/4/28 ronald braswell <rpbraswell@gmail.com>:
I have heard reports of this on 1.9.x. Do you know if this problem has
[#44704] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6373][Open] public #self — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>
Issue #6373 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#44743] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6375][Open] Python notation for literal Hash — "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>
[#44748] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6376][Open] Feature lookup and checking if feature is loaded — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 6:02 AM, mame (Yusuke Endoh) <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:
[ruby-core:44065] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4453] Overriding #to_s changes #inspect
Issue #4453 has been updated by naruse (Yui NARUSE).
qwerty55 (salvatore giudice) wrote:
> Is there some reason that this bug persists for years?
Because you didn't report it.
You should thank yimutang.
----------------------------------------
Bug #4453: Overriding #to_s changes #inspect
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4453#change-25595
Author: yimutang (Joey Zhou)
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Category:
Target version:
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2p180 (2011-02-18) [i386-mingw32]
# My Ruby is: ruby 1.9.2p180 (2011-02-18) [i386-mingw32]
# sample codes 1:
class Foo # subclass of Object, inherits #inspect and #to_s
def initialize(bar,baz)
@bar, @baz = bar, baz
end
end
obj = Foo.new(:cat, :dog)
puts "\n== #inspect ====="
p obj #<Foo:0xb44398 @bar=:cat, @baz=:dog>
puts obj.inspect #<Foo:0xb44398 @bar=:cat, @baz=:dog>
printf "%p", obj #<Foo:0xb44398 @bar=:cat, @baz=:dog>
puts "\n== #to_s ========"
puts obj.to_s #<Foo:0xb44398>
printf "%s", obj #<Foo:0xb44398>
# Yes, #inspect and #to_s are not synonyms, they return different strings.
# sample codes 2, add 'def to_s':
class Foo
def initialize(bar,baz)
@bar, @baz = bar, baz
end
def to_s # override #to_s method
"has @bar = #{@bar}, @baz = #{@baz}."
end
end
obj = Foo.new(:cat, :dog)
puts "\n== #inspect ====="
p obj # has @bar = cat, @baz = dog.
puts obj.inspect # has @bar = cat, @baz = dog.
printf "%p", obj # has @bar = cat, @baz = dog.
puts "\n== #to_s ========"
puts obj.to_s # has @bar = cat, @baz = dog.
printf "%s", obj # has @bar = cat, @baz = dog.
# However, overriding #to_s makes #inspect do the identical thing. I don't think it's perfect.
# In fact, the problem was reported in 2009. http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/1786
# At the bottom of the page, Matz said:
# "Redefining #to_s should not affect inspect, if they are totally different."
# I agree with Matz. #to_s and #inspcet should not be synonyms:
# #to_s maybe for the user of the application, they want a readable message;
# but #inspect maybe for the programmer, they want a debug information.
# So, if this is a bug, maybe it should be fixed. If it's a feature in 1.9.2, I think it's not a good one,
# because I lose a quick and convenient debug method to know an object's class the its instance variables.
# I may want to show something readable to user of my app, as well as something usable for myself.
# The feature (or bug) doesn't satisfy both.
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/