[#70252] Re: [ruby-cvs:58640] nobu:r51492 (trunk): node.c: NODE_ALLOCA for ALLOCV — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Besides possible backwards compatibility, can we drop volatile
3 messages
2015/08/05
[#70257] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11420] [Open] Introduce ID key table into MRI — ko1@...
Issue #11420 has been reported by Koichi Sasada.
11 messages
2015/08/06
[#70337] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11420] [Open] Introduce ID key table into MRI
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/08/11
Nice. Thank you guys for looking into this.
[#70349] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11420] [Open] Introduce ID key table into MRI
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/08/12
Btw, did you consider using flexible array to avoid extra malloc
[#70355] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11420] [Open] Introduce ID key table into MRI
— Юрий Соколов <funny.falcon@...>
2015/08/12
I thought to suggest to embed hash_id_table directly into places when it is
[#70356] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11420] [Open] Introduce ID key table into MRI
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/08/12
On 2015/08/13 4:29, Юрий Соколов wrote:
[#70358] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11420] [Open] Introduce ID key table into MRI
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/08/12
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#70509] [Ruby trunk - Misc #11276] [RFC] compile.c: convert to use ccan/list — ko1@...
Issue #11276 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
3 messages
2015/08/21
[#70639] the undefined behavior of an iterator if it is modified inside of the block to which it yields — Daniel Doubrovkine <dblock@...>
(this is my first time e-mailing list list, so apologies for any misstep :)
4 messages
2015/08/31
[ruby-core:70264] [Ruby trunk - Feature #6284] Add composition for procs
From:
systho@...
Date:
2015-08-07 07:21:07 UTC
List:
ruby-core #70264
Issue #6284 has been updated by Philippe Van Eerdenbrugghe.
Martin D端rst wrote:
> I'm teaching Haskell in a graduate class, so I'm quite familiar with function composition and use it a lot, but the original example isn't convincing at all. For me, in Ruby, something like val.strip.capitalize reads much, much better than some artificially forced function composition. If there were a method String#prepend, it would be even more natural: val.strip.capitalize.prepend('Title: ').
>
> If there are better examples that feel more natural in Ruby, please post them here.
I fully agree with you that a good example really helps to understand the problem which lead to a better solution.
The few times I've missed function composition is ruby is always when I wanted to replace the same pattern :
~~~
res = step1(base)
res = step2(res)
res = step3(res)
...
res
~~~
I hate having to mutate the res variable and I would hate even more creating different temp variables especially when I do not know how many steps there will be. I would like to be able to combine the steps then apply the step combination to *base*
There are a lot of examples for this pattern so here is one : data retrieval with ActiveRecord ( I assume most people know this library but this is only an example )
~~~
messages = all_messages
messages = restrict_to_owner(messages, owner)
filters.each do |filter|
messages = filter.apply(messages)
end
messages = messages.order(created_at: :asc)
messages = paginate(messages)
~~~
----------------------------------------
Feature #6284: Add composition for procs
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6284#change-53689
* Author: Pablo Herrero
* Status: Feedback
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Yukihiro Matsumoto
----------------------------------------
=begin
It would be nice to be able to compose procs like functions in functional programming languages:
to_camel = :capitalize.to_proc
add_header = ->val {"Title: " + val}
format_as_title = add_header << to_camel << :strip
instead of:
format_as_title = lambda {|val| "Title: " + val.strip.capitalize }
It's pretty easy to implement in pure ruby:
class Proc
def << block
proc { |*args| self.call( block.to_proc.call(*args) ) }
end
end
=end
---Files--------------------------------
0002-proc.c-Implement-Method-for-Method-composition.patch (2.71 KB)
0001-proc.c-Implement-Proc-for-Proc-composition.patch (3.73 KB)
0003-proc.c-Support-any-callable-when-composing-Procs.patch (4.01 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/