[#46930] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6825][Open] forking and pthread_cond_timedwait: Invalid argument (EINVAL) on OS X / 1.9.3-p194 — "xentronium (Mark A)" <markizko@...>

29 messages 2012/08/02

[#46974] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6830][Assigned] test failure test_constants(OpenSSL::TestConfig) [/ruby/test/openssl/test_config.rb:27] on Mac + homebrew — "kosaki (Motohiro KOSAKI)" <kosaki.motohiro@...>

17 messages 2012/08/04

[#46975] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6831][Assigned] test_getpwuid() on Mountain Lion — "kosaki (Motohiro KOSAKI)" <kosaki.motohiro@...>

12 messages 2012/08/04

[#46996] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6836][Assigned] Improve File.expand_path performance in Windows — "luislavena (Luis Lavena)" <luislavena@...>

15 messages 2012/08/04

[#47036] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6841][Open] Shorthand for Assigning Return Value of Method to Self — "wardrop (Tom Wardrop)" <tom@...>

18 messages 2012/08/07

[#47108] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6852][Open] [].transpose should behave specially — "boris_stitnicky (Boris Stitnicky)" <boris@...>

13 messages 2012/08/10

[#47138] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6861][Open] ERB::Util.escape_html is not escaping single quotes — "spastorino (Santiago Pastorino)" <santiago@...>

14 messages 2012/08/12

[#47163] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6865][Open] GC::Profiler.report might create a huge String and invoke a few GC cycles — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <redmine@...>

9 messages 2012/08/13

[#47189] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6868][Open] Make `do` in block syntax optional when the block is the last argument of a method and is not an optional argument — "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>

8 messages 2012/08/14

[#47243] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6895][Open] TracePoint API — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>

27 messages 2012/08/20

[#47267] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6903][Open] [[Ruby 1.9:]] --enable-load-relative broken on systems with /lib64 — "mpapis (Michal Papis)" <mpapis@...>

11 messages 2012/08/22

[#47309] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6929][Open] Documentation for Ripper — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <zachary@...>

16 messages 2012/08/25

[#47345] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6946][Open] FIPS support? — "vo.x (Vit Ondruch)" <v.ondruch@...>

35 messages 2012/08/28

[ruby-core:46924] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6361] Bitwise string operations

From: "MartinBosslet (Martin Bosslet)" <Martin.Bosslet@...>
Date: 2012-08-02 02:20:37 UTC
List: ruby-core #46924
Issue #6361 has been updated by MartinBosslet (Martin Bosslet).


mame (Yusuke Endoh) wrote:
> Martin Bosslet and Joshua Ballanco,
> 
> Sorry but this proposal was rejected at the developer meeting (7/21).
> 
> Matz explicitly said he will not accept another class than String.
> He hates Python way.
> 

No problem! It's very specific and I understand well that it certainly
adds complexity that is not needed often enough. I still believe that
having something like ByteString would boost low-level IO performance a
lot - I'll take the gem route then, I have some ideas there. Maybe I'll 
get the chance to discuss some of them with Matz at LSRC next week :) 
 
> Two additional notes:
> 
> * The original request (bitwise string operation) was not considered
>   because it is not essential for ByteString; if you want, please file
>   a new ticket for the specific feature with the detailed spec including
>   corner cases (e.g., [ruby-core:44646]).

OK, I'll open another issue for this.

----------------------------------------
Feature #6361: Bitwise string operations
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6361#change-28587

Author: MartinBosslet (Martin Bosslet)
Status: Rejected
Priority: Normal
Assignee: 
Category: core
Target version: 


I know this has been discussed a lot in the past (and if there's still 
an open issue for this, I apologize, I couldn't find one), for example
in [1]. While it is generally no problem to implement this on the fly,
I still find that built-in support would be a real improvement. There
are quite some use cases in cryptography where this would come in very
handy, but I'm sure there are lots of other areas, too.

While of course I understand the reasons that were given in the previous
threads that ultimately lead to rejection, I still would like to reopen
the discussion as I felt that in every thread so far the consensus was
that having bitwise string operations would indeed be quite valuable. 

[1] http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/34586


-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread

Prev Next