[#44036] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6242][Open] Ruby should support lists — "shugo (Shugo Maeda)" <redmine@...>

20 messages 2012/04/01

[#44084] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6246][Open] 1.9.3-p125 intermittent segfault — "jshow (Jodi Showers)" <jodi@...>

22 messages 2012/04/02

[#44156] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6265][Open] Remove 'useless' 'concatenation' syntax — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>

45 messages 2012/04/06

[#44163] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6266][Open] encoding related exception with recent integrated psych — "jonforums (Jon Forums)" <redmine@...>

10 messages 2012/04/06

[#44303] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6284][Open] Add composition for procs — "pabloh (Pablo Herrero)" <pablodherrero@...>

57 messages 2012/04/12

[#44349] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6293][Open] new queue / blocking queues — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>

10 messages 2012/04/13

[#44402] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6308][Open] Eliminate delegation from WeakRef — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>

20 messages 2012/04/17

[#44403] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6309][Open] Add a reference queue for weak references — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>

15 messages 2012/04/17

[#44533] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6341][Open] SIGSEGV: Thread.new { fork { GC.start } }.join — "rudolf (r stu3)" <redmine@...>

24 messages 2012/04/22

[#44630] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6361][Open] Bitwise string operations — "MartinBosslet (Martin Bosslet)" <Martin.Bosslet@...>

31 messages 2012/04/26

[#44648] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6367][Open] #same? for Enumerable — "prijutme4ty (Ilya Vorontsov)" <prijutme4ty@...>

16 messages 2012/04/26

[#44704] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6373][Open] public #self — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>

61 messages 2012/04/27

[#44748] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6376][Open] Feature lookup and checking if feature is loaded — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>

13 messages 2012/04/28

[ruby-core:44340] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6288][Feedback] Change error message for thread block to be less misleading

From: "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...>
Date: 2012-04-13 14:07:51 UTC
List: ruby-core #44340
Issue #6288 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

Status changed from Open to Feedback

Is "possible deadlock detected" better?

Please elaborate "a more complex scenario" with small example.

-- 
Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp>
----------------------------------------
Bug #6288: Change error message for thread block to be less misleading
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6288#change-25884

Author: rklemme (Robert Klemme)
Status: Feedback
Priority: Normal
Assignee: 
Category: core
Target version: 
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.3p125 (2012-02-16) [i386-cygwin]


Test case:

11:50:07 ~$ ruby19 -r thread -e 'q=SizedQueue.new 10;1_000_000.times {|i| p i;q.enq i}'
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
/opt/lib/ruby/1.9.1/thread.rb:301:in `sleep': deadlock detected (fatal)
        from /opt/lib/ruby/1.9.1/thread.rb:301:in `block in push'
        from <internal:prelude>:10:in `synchronize'
        from /opt/lib/ruby/1.9.1/thread.rb:297:in `push'
        from -e:1:in `block in <main>'
        from -e:1:in `times'
        from -e:1:in `<main>'


This is not a deadlock, but there is no other thread which could wake up main thread.  Deadlock is misleading because in a more complex scenario where I had the error initially it wasn't obvious that the other thread had died and I looked for the wrong error in my code.


-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread