[#119000] [Ruby master Bug#20710] Reducing Hash allocation introduces large performance degradation (probably related to VWA) — "pocke (Masataka Kuwabara) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20710 has been reported by pocke (Masataka Kuwabara).

6 messages 2024/09/02

[#119033] [Ruby master Bug#20713] Ruby 3.3.5 triggers a deprecation warning with `require "json"` — "Bo98 (Bo Anderson) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20713 has been reported by Bo98 (Bo Anderson).

7 messages 2024/09/04

[#119041] [Ruby master Bug#20714] Handle optional dependencies in `bundled_gems.rb` — "Earlopain (A S) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20714 has been reported by Earlopain (A S).

31 messages 2024/09/04

[#119074] [Ruby master Bug#20716] Different instance_method behavior in Ruby 2.7 and Ruby 3.x — "natton (Tien Truong) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20716 has been reported by natton (Tien Truong).

13 messages 2024/09/06

[#119145] [Ruby master Misc#20728] Propose Eileen Uchitelle as a core committer — "kddnewton (Kevin Newton) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20728 has been reported by kddnewton (Kevin Newton).

14 messages 2024/09/12

[#119168] [Ruby master Feature#20738] Removing a specific entry from a hash literal — "ursm (Keita Urashima) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20738 has been reported by ursm (Keita Urashima).

16 messages 2024/09/13

[#119199] [Ruby master Bug#20742] Trying to assign to a variable in statement modifier should emit a warning — "esad (Esad Hajdarevic) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

SXNzdWUgIzIwNzQyIGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IGVzYWQgKEVzYWQgSGFqZGFyZXZpYyku

7 messages 2024/09/15

[#119208] [Ruby master Bug#20745] IO::Buffer#copy triggers UB when src/dest buffers overlap — "hanazuki (Kasumi Hanazuki) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20745 has been reported by hanazuki (Kasumi Hanazuki).

8 messages 2024/09/16

[#119239] [Ruby master Feature#20750] Expose ruby_thread_has_gvl_p in ruby/thread.h — "kbrock (Keenan Brock) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20750 has been reported by kbrock (Keenan Brock).

8 messages 2024/09/17

[#119248] [Ruby master Bug#20752] IO::Buffer#slice fails to copy readonly flag, allowing writes into frozen String — "hanazuki (Kasumi Hanazuki) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20752 has been reported by hanazuki (Kasumi Hanazuki).

7 messages 2024/09/18

[#119301] [Ruby master Bug#20761] [DOC] `RubyVM::AbstractSyntaxTree.of` examples raise because parser is prism by default — "Earlopain (A S) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20761 has been reported by Earlopain (A S).

11 messages 2024/09/26

[#119335] [Ruby master Bug#20770] A *new* pipe operator proposal — "AlexandreMagro (Alexandre Magro) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20770 has been reported by AlexandreMagro (Alexandre Magro).

56 messages 2024/09/29

[ruby-core:119044] [Ruby master Bug#20714] Handle optional dependencies in `bundled_gems.rb`

From: "Earlopain (A S) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Date: 2024-09-04 16:20:10 UTC
List: ruby-core #119044
Issue #20714 has been updated by Earlopain (A S).


Thanks for you reply, I was about to write something similar about the older rubies.

At first I was writing about how I don't think a new api is really necessary since the compatibility code can simply be dropped once `required_ruby_version` is at or above the ruby version that would error but I don't think that is entirely true. For example, on ruby 3.4 the following script produces this output:

```rb
begin
  require "webrick"
rescue LoadError
end

if defined?(Webrick)
  puts "Do some things"
end

# test.rb:2: warning: webrick was loaded from the standard library, but is not part of the default gems starting from Ruby 3.0.0.
# You can add webrick to your Gemfile or gemspec to silence this warning.
```

So even though webrick is gone since Ruby 3.0, I'd still have to do some trickery to optionally enhance it without triggering the warning.

I see two solutions:
* `require "foo", optional: true` like you suggested
* Drop warnings when ruby would throw an error [here]. When the require will raise, it doesn't need to warn. This is how I already imagined it works. I guess it doesn't for visibility?

[here]: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/294dad22d7ac5f307d567cff897507b9fd9d05e9/lib/bundled_gems.rb#L6-L36

----------------------------------------
Bug #20714: Handle optional dependencies in `bundled_gems.rb`
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20714#change-109622

* Author: Earlopain (A S)
* Status: Open
* ruby -v: 3.3.5
* Backport: 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
I've encountered a few places around bundled gems where the library doesn't care if the gem is available, but will still provide some functionallity if it is.

The way to accomplish that right now seems to be by setting `$VERBOSE = nil` and resetting it later again to not bother the user with the warning about the gem. However, this has the effect of silencing the warning about other gems as well, that may not be prepared about the bundling. 

>>From `ruby/reline` for example: https://github.com/ruby/reline/blob/c90f08f7e308d2f1cdd7cfaf9939fe45ce546fd2/lib/reline/terminfo.rb#L1-L15
Or the `logging` gem: https://github.com/TwP/logging/blob/df41715364f7eb8c65098cd3c3316677ef1f3784/lib/logging.rb#L9-L15

I propose to simply delay the warning to the next require.

GitHub PR at https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/11545



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
 ______________________________________________
 ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
 To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
 ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/


In This Thread