[#419] Re: Contrast Ruby and Other Languages — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...>
Hi,
11 messages
1999/11/01
[#925] Re: Anybody knows of an English translation for... — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...>
I don't have the originally posted mail so its thread is broken but..
4 messages
1999/11/24
[#927] Python complaints — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Hi,
11 messages
1999/11/25
[#930] Re: Python complaints
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/11/25
Hi,
[#931] Re: Python complaints
— Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
1999/11/25
GOTO Kentaro writes:
[#937] Re: Python complaints
— William Park <parkw@...>
1999/11/25
On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 08:53:08AM +0100, Clemens Hintze wrote:
[ruby-talk:00917] Re: Determining the called class in tracing
From:
Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date:
1999-11-09 16:32:09 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #917
matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes: > |Is there any way to determine the identity of the class containing the > |invoked method on a 'call' or 'c-call' trace event? > > `call' and `c-call' do not contain class information, but `return' and > `c-return' event do. > > Should we add information to the `call' and `c-call'? What I'm looking at doing is adding DbC features (class invariants, pre- and post-conditions), and I thought it would be interesting to try to use the trace facility to do it. The current problem is identifying from the trace exactly which method is being executed. Right now I'm playing around with ways of doing this using the binding passed in, so I'm not requesting any changes to tracing. Regards Dave -- Thomas Consulting. Innovative and successful developments with Unix, Java, C, and C++. Out now! The Pragmatic Programmer. www.pragmaticprogrammer.com/ppbook/