[#98098] [Ruby master Feature#16824] Follow RubyGems naming conventions for the stdlib — shannonskipper@...

Issue #16824 has been reported by shan (Shannon Skipper).

14 messages 2020/05/01

[#98147] [Ruby master Feature#16832] Use #name rather than #inspect to build "uninitialized constant" error messages — jean.boussier@...

Issue #16832 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

20 messages 2020/05/06

[#98174] [Ruby master Bug#16837] Can we make Ruby 3.0 as fast as Ruby 2.7 with the new assertions? — takashikkbn@...

Issue #16837 has been reported by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).

10 messages 2020/05/07

[#98241] [Ruby master Bug#16845] Building Ruby with old existing system Ruby results in make error with ./tool/file2lastrev.rb — erik@...

Issue #16845 has been reported by ErikSwan (Erik Swan).

7 messages 2020/05/09

[#98256] [Ruby master Feature#16847] Cache instruction sequences by default — jean.boussier@...

Issue #16847 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

16 messages 2020/05/11

[#98257] [Ruby master Feature#16848] Allow callables in $LOAD_PATH — jean.boussier@...

Issue #16848 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

27 messages 2020/05/11

[#98318] [Ruby master Bug#16853] calling bla(hash, **kw) with a string-based hash passes the strings into **kw (worked < 2.7) — sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org

Issue #16853 has been reported by sylvain.joyeux (Sylvain Joyeux).

12 messages 2020/05/13

[#98355] [Ruby master Bug#16889] TracePoint.enable { ... } also activates the TracePoint for other threads, even outside the block — eregontp@...

Issue #16889 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

16 messages 2020/05/14

[#98363] [Ruby master Feature#16891] Restore Positional Argument to Keyword Conversion — merch-redmine@...

Issue #16891 has been reported by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans).

23 messages 2020/05/14

[#98371] [Ruby master Feature#16894] Integer division for Ruby 3 — andrew@...

Issue #16894 has been reported by ankane (Andrew Kane).

18 messages 2020/05/15

[#98391] [Ruby master Bug#16896] MakeMakefile methods should be private — eregontp@...

Issue #16896 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

10 messages 2020/05/15

[#98396] [Ruby master Feature#16897] Can a Ruby 3.0 compatible general purpose memoizer be written in such a way that it matches Ruby 2 performance? — sam.saffron@...

Issue #16897 has been reported by sam.saffron (Sam Saffron).

25 messages 2020/05/16

[#98453] [Ruby master Bug#16904] rubygems: psych: superclass mismatch for class Mark (TypeError) — jaruga@...

Issue #16904 has been reported by jaruga (Jun Aruga).

18 messages 2020/05/20

[#98486] [Ruby master Bug#16908] Strange behaviour of Hash#shift when used with `default_proc`. — samuel@...

Issue #16908 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).

14 messages 2020/05/23

[#98569] [Ruby master Bug#16921] s390x: ramdom test failures for timeout or segmentation fault — jaruga@...

Issue #16921 has been reported by jaruga (Jun Aruga).

9 messages 2020/05/29

[#98599] [Ruby master Bug#16926] Kernel#require does not load a feature twice when $LOAD_PATH has been modified spec fails only on 2.7 — eregontp@...

Issue #16926 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

12 messages 2020/05/31

[ruby-core:98406] [Ruby master Feature#16898] Modify the syntax of -> lambda expressions in ruby3

From: fyjzyyx@...
Date: 2020-05-17 06:04:38 UTC
List: ruby-core #98406
Issue #16898 has been reported by jackmaple (maple jack).

----------------------------------------
Feature #16898: Modify the syntax of -> lambda expressions in ruby3
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16898

* Author: jackmaple (maple jack)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
Hello ruby team.
Can we modify the syntax of lambda expressions in ruby3?
The current definition of lambda expression was added in ruby1.9, but this syntax looks too ugly.
``` ruby
lambda {|x| x + 1}   #This looks elegant.
#but...
-> x {x + 1}    #oh,no
-> x do x + 1 end  #this syntax looks too ugly
```
So are we going to abandon some historical issues? To modify -> lambda syntax?
It looks like this:
``` ruby
x -> x + 1
(x,y) -> x + y
x -> y -> x + y
x -> {
   x + 1
   x + 2
}
```
I think do..end or braces are only needed when there are multiple lines of code,lambda expression if there is only one statement should not need parentheses or do ... end block.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread

Prev Next