[#98098] [Ruby master Feature#16824] Follow RubyGems naming conventions for the stdlib — shannonskipper@...

Issue #16824 has been reported by shan (Shannon Skipper).

14 messages 2020/05/01

[#98147] [Ruby master Feature#16832] Use #name rather than #inspect to build "uninitialized constant" error messages — jean.boussier@...

Issue #16832 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

20 messages 2020/05/06

[#98174] [Ruby master Bug#16837] Can we make Ruby 3.0 as fast as Ruby 2.7 with the new assertions? — takashikkbn@...

Issue #16837 has been reported by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).

10 messages 2020/05/07

[#98241] [Ruby master Bug#16845] Building Ruby with old existing system Ruby results in make error with ./tool/file2lastrev.rb — erik@...

Issue #16845 has been reported by ErikSwan (Erik Swan).

7 messages 2020/05/09

[#98256] [Ruby master Feature#16847] Cache instruction sequences by default — jean.boussier@...

Issue #16847 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

16 messages 2020/05/11

[#98257] [Ruby master Feature#16848] Allow callables in $LOAD_PATH — jean.boussier@...

Issue #16848 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

27 messages 2020/05/11

[#98318] [Ruby master Bug#16853] calling bla(hash, **kw) with a string-based hash passes the strings into **kw (worked < 2.7) — sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org

Issue #16853 has been reported by sylvain.joyeux (Sylvain Joyeux).

12 messages 2020/05/13

[#98355] [Ruby master Bug#16889] TracePoint.enable { ... } also activates the TracePoint for other threads, even outside the block — eregontp@...

Issue #16889 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

16 messages 2020/05/14

[#98363] [Ruby master Feature#16891] Restore Positional Argument to Keyword Conversion — merch-redmine@...

Issue #16891 has been reported by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans).

23 messages 2020/05/14

[#98371] [Ruby master Feature#16894] Integer division for Ruby 3 — andrew@...

Issue #16894 has been reported by ankane (Andrew Kane).

18 messages 2020/05/15

[#98391] [Ruby master Bug#16896] MakeMakefile methods should be private — eregontp@...

Issue #16896 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

10 messages 2020/05/15

[#98396] [Ruby master Feature#16897] Can a Ruby 3.0 compatible general purpose memoizer be written in such a way that it matches Ruby 2 performance? — sam.saffron@...

Issue #16897 has been reported by sam.saffron (Sam Saffron).

25 messages 2020/05/16

[#98453] [Ruby master Bug#16904] rubygems: psych: superclass mismatch for class Mark (TypeError) — jaruga@...

Issue #16904 has been reported by jaruga (Jun Aruga).

18 messages 2020/05/20

[#98486] [Ruby master Bug#16908] Strange behaviour of Hash#shift when used with `default_proc`. — samuel@...

Issue #16908 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).

14 messages 2020/05/23

[#98569] [Ruby master Bug#16921] s390x: ramdom test failures for timeout or segmentation fault — jaruga@...

Issue #16921 has been reported by jaruga (Jun Aruga).

9 messages 2020/05/29

[#98599] [Ruby master Bug#16926] Kernel#require does not load a feature twice when $LOAD_PATH has been modified spec fails only on 2.7 — eregontp@...

Issue #16926 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

12 messages 2020/05/31

[ruby-core:98409] [Ruby master Bug#16852] Refining Enumerable fails with ruby 2.7

From: manga.osyo@...
Date: 2020-05-17 09:34:58 UTC
List: ruby-core #98409
Issue #16852 has been updated by osyo (manga osyo).


hi.
Thanks for issues :)

I got the same error when `include M` after `refine M`.

```ruby
module M; end
class X
  include M
end

module RefinementBug
  refine M do
    def refined_method
      puts "Called #refined_method"
    end
  end
end

class Y
  # Error if include M
  include M
end

using RefinementBug

puts "Using Ruby #{RUBY_VERSION}"

# error: undefined method `refined_method' for #<X:0x000055d4e22468c0> (NoMethodError)
X.new.refined_method
```

see: https://wandbox.org/permlink/bE3AvLBRnu07wtJY


By the way, RSpec caused an error due to `require "stringio"`.
This is because `stringio` does `include Enumerable`.

```ruby
module RefinementBug
  refine Enumerable do
    def refined_method
      puts "Called #refined_method"
    end
  end
end

# Error if `require "stringio"`
require "stringio"

using RefinementBug

puts "Using Ruby #{RUBY_VERSION}"

# error: undefined method `refined_method' for []:Array (NoMethodError)
[].refined_method
```


----------------------------------------
Bug #16852: Refining Enumerable fails with ruby 2.7
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16852#change-85679

* Author: parker (Parker Finch)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* ruby -v: ruby 2.7.1p83 (2020-03-31 revision a0c7c23c9c) [x86_64-darwin19]
* Backport: 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
When using [rspec](https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core) and ruby 2.7 I am unable to refine `Enumerable`. I have created an [issue in rspec](https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/issues/2727) but I'm wondering if there's an underlying ruby issue. (This bug does not occur when using ruby 2.6 or 2.5.)

### Code to reproduce
(Also attached as a `.tar.gz`):
```ruby
# file: refinement_bug.rb
module RefinementBug
  refine Enumerable do
    def refined_method
      puts "Called #refined_method"
    end
  end
end
```
```ruby
# file: spec/spec_helper.rb
require_relative "../refinement_bug"
```
```ruby
# file: spec/test.rb

require_relative "../refinement_bug"

using RefinementBug

puts "Using Ruby #{RUBY_VERSION}"
[].refined_method
```
After installing rspec (`gem install rspec`), call via `rspec spec/test.rb --format progress --require spec_helper`.

### Expected Behavior
When run on Ruby 2.6 and 2.5 I get the expected behavior. The `Enumerable` module is refined, which allows an instance of `Array` to call `#refined_method`.
```
# This is output when running on ruby 2.6.6, and is expected.
~/minimal_refinement_failure> rspec spec/test.rb
Using Ruby 2.6.6
Called #refined_method
No examples found.

Finished in 0.0004 seconds (files took 0.08706 seconds to load)
0 examples, 0 failures
```

### Actual Behavior
When I run the same code on ruby 2.7 I get a `NoMethodError`, suggesting that the `Enumerable` module has not been refined.
```
~/minimal_refinement_failure> rspec spec/test.rb
Using Ruby 2.7.1

An error occurred while loading ./spec/test.rb.
Failure/Error: [].refined_method

NoMethodError:
  undefined method `refined_method' for []:Array
# ./spec/test.rb:8:in `<top (required)>'
No examples found.

Finished in 0.00003 seconds (files took 0.12287 seconds to load)
0 examples, 0 failures, 1 error occurred outside of examples
```

### Investigation
There are a few changes that prevent this bug from manifesting:
* If I refine `Kernel` instead of `Enumerable` then I get the expected behavior using Ruby 2.7.
* If I refine `Array` instead of `Enumerable` then I get the expected behavior using Ruby 2.7.

This bug does *not* manifest if run directly via ruby (i.e. `ruby -r ./spec/spec_helper.rb spec/test.rb` succeeds). It only manifests when run via `rspec`.

I can also get the expected behavior by changing the rspec options:
* If I don't use the `--require` option with `rspec` (e.g. run it as `rspec spec/test.rb --format progress`) then I get the expected behavior.
* If I don't use the `--format` option with `rspec` (e.g. run it as `rspec spec/test.rb --require spec_helper`) then I get the expected behavior.

This suggests the underlying issue might be in `rspec`. But if it is, I'm curious why the change to ruby 2.7 causes this to manifest, and whether Ruby 2.7 accidentally broke some expected behavior.

Thank you for looking into this, I am very confused :)
Let me know how I can help with this!

---Files--------------------------------
minimal_refinement_failure.tar.gz (415 Bytes)


-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread