[#98098] [Ruby master Feature#16824] Follow RubyGems naming conventions for the stdlib — shannonskipper@...

Issue #16824 has been reported by shan (Shannon Skipper).

14 messages 2020/05/01

[#98147] [Ruby master Feature#16832] Use #name rather than #inspect to build "uninitialized constant" error messages — jean.boussier@...

Issue #16832 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

20 messages 2020/05/06

[#98174] [Ruby master Bug#16837] Can we make Ruby 3.0 as fast as Ruby 2.7 with the new assertions? — takashikkbn@...

Issue #16837 has been reported by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).

10 messages 2020/05/07

[#98241] [Ruby master Bug#16845] Building Ruby with old existing system Ruby results in make error with ./tool/file2lastrev.rb — erik@...

Issue #16845 has been reported by ErikSwan (Erik Swan).

7 messages 2020/05/09

[#98256] [Ruby master Feature#16847] Cache instruction sequences by default — jean.boussier@...

Issue #16847 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

16 messages 2020/05/11

[#98257] [Ruby master Feature#16848] Allow callables in $LOAD_PATH — jean.boussier@...

Issue #16848 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

27 messages 2020/05/11

[#98318] [Ruby master Bug#16853] calling bla(hash, **kw) with a string-based hash passes the strings into **kw (worked < 2.7) — sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org

Issue #16853 has been reported by sylvain.joyeux (Sylvain Joyeux).

12 messages 2020/05/13

[#98355] [Ruby master Bug#16889] TracePoint.enable { ... } also activates the TracePoint for other threads, even outside the block — eregontp@...

Issue #16889 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

16 messages 2020/05/14

[#98363] [Ruby master Feature#16891] Restore Positional Argument to Keyword Conversion — merch-redmine@...

Issue #16891 has been reported by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans).

23 messages 2020/05/14

[#98371] [Ruby master Feature#16894] Integer division for Ruby 3 — andrew@...

Issue #16894 has been reported by ankane (Andrew Kane).

18 messages 2020/05/15

[#98391] [Ruby master Bug#16896] MakeMakefile methods should be private — eregontp@...

Issue #16896 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

10 messages 2020/05/15

[#98396] [Ruby master Feature#16897] Can a Ruby 3.0 compatible general purpose memoizer be written in such a way that it matches Ruby 2 performance? — sam.saffron@...

Issue #16897 has been reported by sam.saffron (Sam Saffron).

25 messages 2020/05/16

[#98453] [Ruby master Bug#16904] rubygems: psych: superclass mismatch for class Mark (TypeError) — jaruga@...

Issue #16904 has been reported by jaruga (Jun Aruga).

18 messages 2020/05/20

[#98486] [Ruby master Bug#16908] Strange behaviour of Hash#shift when used with `default_proc`. — samuel@...

Issue #16908 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).

14 messages 2020/05/23

[#98569] [Ruby master Bug#16921] s390x: ramdom test failures for timeout or segmentation fault — jaruga@...

Issue #16921 has been reported by jaruga (Jun Aruga).

9 messages 2020/05/29

[#98599] [Ruby master Bug#16926] Kernel#require does not load a feature twice when $LOAD_PATH has been modified spec fails only on 2.7 — eregontp@...

Issue #16926 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

12 messages 2020/05/31

[ruby-core:98418] [Ruby master Feature#16898] Modify the syntax of -> lambda expressions in ruby3

From: fyjzyyx@...
Date: 2020-05-17 23:04:47 UTC
List: ruby-core #98418
Issue #16898 has been updated by jackmaple (maple jack).


matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote in #note-3:
> "Ugliness is in the eye of the beholder". Could you explain why the current syntax is ugly?
> 
> In any case, if we change the syntax, all Ruby programs that use the current **ugly** lambda syntax no longer work. How do you think? Is it worth the pain of the whole Ruby community?
> 
> Matz.

Hello, we currently have lambda syntax, but at present-> seems to be just a simplified alternative,-> The braces behind can not be omitted when there is only one line of statement, or we can add a new lambda syntax, thank you.

----------------------------------------
Feature #16898: Modify the syntax of -> lambda expressions in ruby3
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16898#change-85688

* Author: jackmaple (maple jack)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
Hello ruby team.
Can we modify the syntax of lambda expressions in ruby3?
The current definition of lambda expression was added in ruby1.9, but this syntax looks too ugly.
``` ruby
lambda {|x| x + 1}   #This looks elegant.
#but...
-> x {x + 1}    #oh,no
-> x do x + 1 end  #this syntax looks too ugly
```
So are we going to abandon some historical issues? To modify -> lambda syntax?
It looks like this:
``` ruby
x -> x + 1
(x,y) -> x + y
x -> y -> x + y
x -> {
   x + 1
   x + 2
}
```
I think do..end or braces are only needed when there are multiple lines of code,lambda expression if there is only one statement should not need parentheses or do ... end block.
Thanks.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread