[#90865] [Ruby trunk Bug#15499] Breaking behavior on ruby 2.6: rb_thread_call_without_gvl doesn't invoke unblock_function when used on the main thread — apolcyn@...
Issue #15499 has been reported by apolcyn (alex polcyn).
3 messages
2019/01/03
[#90877] [Ruby trunk Bug#15499] Breaking behavior on ruby 2.6: rb_thread_call_without_gvl doesn't invoke unblock_function when used on the main thread — apolcyn@...
Issue #15499 has been updated by apolcyn (alex polcyn).
3 messages
2019/01/03
[#90895] Re: [ruby-alerts:11680] failure alert on trunk-mjit@silicon-docker (NG (r66707)) — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
ko1c-failure@atdot.net wrote:
4 messages
2019/01/05
[#90896] Re: [ruby-alerts:11680] failure alert on trunk-mjit@silicon-docker (NG (r66707))
— Takashi Kokubun <takashikkbn@...>
2019/01/05
Thanks to explain that.
[#91200] [Ruby trunk Feature#15553] Addrinfo.getaddrinfo supports timeout — glass.saga@...
Issue #15553 has been reported by Glass_saga (Masaki Matsushita).
4 messages
2019/01/21
[#91289] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#15553] Addrinfo.getaddrinfo supports timeout
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2019/01/26
glass.saga@gmail.com wrote:
[ruby-core:91206] [Ruby trunk Bug#12812] Added Coverage#result=
From:
mame@...
Date:
2019-01-21 08:37:36 UTC
List:
ruby-core #91206
Issue #12812 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh). Status changed from Assigned to Feedback Sorry for leaving this ticket untouched. I cannot remember the detailed story of this ticket, but since 2.6, coverage library has supported `Coverage.result(stop: false, clear: false)`. Is it enough? I still think `Coverage.result=` is too powerful. ---------------------------------------- Bug #12812: Added Coverage#result= https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12812#change-76443 * Author: zenspider (Ryan Davis) * Status: Feedback * Priority: Normal * Assignee: mame (Yusuke Endoh) * Target version: * ruby -v: * Backport: 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN, 2.3: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Originally submitted here: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/1456 This exposes Coverage.result in a slightly more writeable way and allows coverage analysis to reset to a baseline in a safe way. Note, I wasn't able to figure out how to invalidate the cached pointers in the VM bytecode, so this does `rb_ary_replace` across all the arrays instead. I'd love to see this improved so it were cleaner. This is ongoing work to improve the current state of code coverage analysis. I'll be giving a talk on this at rubyconf 2016. I should also add, this applies cleanly to (at least) 2.3 as well. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>