[#90865] [Ruby trunk Bug#15499] Breaking behavior on ruby 2.6: rb_thread_call_without_gvl doesn't invoke unblock_function when used on the main thread — apolcyn@...
Issue #15499 has been reported by apolcyn (alex polcyn).
3 messages
2019/01/03
[#90877] [Ruby trunk Bug#15499] Breaking behavior on ruby 2.6: rb_thread_call_without_gvl doesn't invoke unblock_function when used on the main thread — apolcyn@...
Issue #15499 has been updated by apolcyn (alex polcyn).
3 messages
2019/01/03
[#90895] Re: [ruby-alerts:11680] failure alert on trunk-mjit@silicon-docker (NG (r66707)) — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
ko1c-failure@atdot.net wrote:
4 messages
2019/01/05
[#90896] Re: [ruby-alerts:11680] failure alert on trunk-mjit@silicon-docker (NG (r66707))
— Takashi Kokubun <takashikkbn@...>
2019/01/05
Thanks to explain that.
[#91200] [Ruby trunk Feature#15553] Addrinfo.getaddrinfo supports timeout — glass.saga@...
Issue #15553 has been reported by Glass_saga (Masaki Matsushita).
4 messages
2019/01/21
[#91289] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#15553] Addrinfo.getaddrinfo supports timeout
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2019/01/26
glass.saga@gmail.com wrote:
[ruby-core:91018] [Ruby trunk Feature#14344] refine at class level
From:
shevegen@...
Date:
2019-01-11 11:05:34 UTC
List:
ruby-core #91018
Issue #14344 has been updated by shevegen (Robert A. Heiler).
I think that:
using do
refine Array do
Is not good. It looks very strange to me.
The other variants, such as the original one:
class Test
refine String do
or just toplevel:
refine String do
would seem better to me.
It may be best to have matz pick a syntax, if he agrees with the feature. :)
(May have to then also update documentation and specification of
refinements; I remember that I was once surprised thinking that I
knew the original definition but upon re-reading it, I realized that
my assumption was not completely correct.)
(On a side note, I think you added it to the recent developer meeting
which already happened; may have to add it to the next one or
just have it be a carry-over to the next meeting.)
----------------------------------------
Feature #14344: refine at class level
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14344#change-76243
* Author: kddeisz (Kevin Deisz)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
I rely on refinements a lot, but don't want to keep writing `Module.new` in code. I'm proposing `Object::refine`, which would create an anonymous module behind the scenes with equivalent functionality. So:
~~~ ruby
class Test
using Module.new {
refine String do
def refined?
true
end
end
}
end
~~~
would become
~~~ ruby
class Test
refine String do
def refined?
true
end
end
end
~~~
It's a small change, but reads a lot more clearly. Thoughts?
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>